Ann Geriatr Med Res Search

CLOSE


Ann Geriatr Med Res > Volume 28(2); 2024 > Article
Makizako, Nakai, Akaida, Taniguchi, Miwa, and Morimoto: Association of Olfactory and Gustatory Function with Memory among Community-Dwelling Independent Older Adults

Abstract

Background

This study examined the association between memory function and reduced olfactory and gustatory function among independent community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 127 older adults (65.4% women). We assessed their memory, odor, and taste identification skills. Open essence (OE) test and taste strips (TS) were used to identify hyposmia (OE test ≤6) and hypogeusia (TS test ≤8), respectively.

Results

Participants with severe hyposmia had significantly poorer memory functions compared to participants without severe hyposmia. After adjusting for covariates, multivariate logistic regression models revealed a significant association between immediate recognition performance and a decreased likelihood of severe hyposmia (odds ratio=0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.47–0.90). We observed no significant association between taste function and memory.

Conclusion

Memory function may be associated with olfactory impairment in older adults.

INTRODUCTION

Impairments in sensory functions, such as olfactory function and taste, are features of several neurodegenerative disorders. Poor olfactory function occurs in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD).1) A longitudinal study with 5-year follow-up indicated that olfactory tests in patients with MCI could help predict AD conversion.2) Gustatory disorders also occur in AD.3) However, studies on gustatory disorders in patients with MCI have yielded inconsistent results.4,5) Thus, gustatory function may be maintained during the early stages of AD.6)
Olfactory and taste abilities decrease with advancing age,7) and many neurodegenerative conditions and health statuses may be associated with olfactory or gustatory dysfunction.8,9) Impairments in odor and taste identification are features of several neurodegenerative disorders. Although moderate or severe reductions in olfactory and gustatory function may correlate with cognitive impairment,7) few healthy older adults are aware of slight reductions in olfactory and gustatory function. Thus, the assessment of hyposmia and hypogeusia may be useful for identifying early cognitive deficits in independent older adults.
Memory deficits are early symptoms of AD and other types of dementia. Older adults without dementia but with problems related to memory have an increased risk for dementia compared with those with challenges in other cognitive dimensions, attention, and executive function.10) Memory plays a specific role in olfactory perception11); however, few studies have assessed gustatory function, with conflicting results. For instance, a previous study that included patients with MCI, AD, and controls did not identify group differences in olfactory threshold, gustatory function, or food preferences.12) In contrast, poor memory, rather than other domains of cognitive function, was associated with poor odor discrimination and identification.12)
The association of memory with olfactory and gustatory functions remains unclear, particularly in independent community-dwelling older adults. This cross-sectional study investigated the association between memory function and reduced olfactory as well as gustatory function in the sample population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

This study included cross-sectional data from 134 independent older adults who participated in community-based blood pressure management classes after participating in the Tarumizu Study 2019 a health check survey. The Tarumizu Study was conducted in collaboration with Kagoshima University’s, Faculty of Medicine, Tarumizu City Office, and Tarumizu Chuo Hospital.13) Participants aged ≥40 years were recruited via mail reply-paid postcards from Tarumizu City, Japan, a residential suburb of Kagoshima City. Totally, 1,024 citizens participated in the Tarumizu Study 2019, conducted between June and December 2019, of which 687 were older adults. Of the participants aged ≥65 years who had participated in blood pressure management classes after a health check survey, 137 participated in additional assessments of odor and taste function. Flyers were distributed to those who were participating in the blood pressure management class to recruit them for this study. Participants who required support in activities of daily living and those with missing data on odor and taste assessments were excluded. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kagoshima University Faculty of Medicine (No. 190090). All participants provided informed consent. Also, this study complied the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research.14)

Olfactory Functioning

We assessed olfactory functioning using the open essence (OE) test (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan),15) which included 12 odor items known to people in Japan (Indian ink, perfume, wood, orange, menthol, curry, rose, cooking gas, Japanese cypress “hinoki,” sweaty clothes, condensed milk, and roasted garlic). Each of the 12 cards contained one odorant and was folded into halves. Microencapsulated test odorants were applied to the left half of the card instead of glue. Six choices, including four alternative odor names, “detectable, but not recognized,” and “no smell detected” were printed in Japanese on the opposite side of the card. The participants chose their answers after opening each card. One of the four odor names was the correct choice, with one point awarded for each correct answer. Herein, we defined hyposmia as participants with an OE test score of ≤6 out of 12.16)

Gustatory Functioning

We used taste strips (TS)17) to assess the gustatory function of the whole mouth. Sixteen TS were impregnated with sweet, sour, bitter, and salty solutions at four different concentrations—sweet (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 g/mL sucrose), sour (0.05, 0.09, 0.165, and 0.3 g/mL citric acid), bitter (0.0004, 0.0009, 0.0024, and 0.006 g/mL quinine-HCl), and salty (0.016, 0.04, 0.1, and 0.25 g/mL NaCl).18) The strips were presented in a predetermined order: sweet, salt, sour, and bitter, starting with the weakest concentration. Each TS was placed on the tongue and the participants were asked to close their mouths. The participants then categorized each strip as sweet, salty, sour, bitter, unidentified, or tasteless. The participants rinsed their mouths with water before tasting each strip. Each taste score ranged from 0 to 4 points (1 point for each correct answer). Thus, the total TS score ranged from 0–16.12) A total TS score ≤8 indicated hypogeusia in this study.17)

Memory Assessment

We applied a subitem (word-list memory) of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Functional Assessment Tool (NCGG-FAT) to assess memory function.19) The wordlist memory tasks involved immediate recognition and delayed recall of a 10-word target list. The participants were asked to memorize 10 words. Each target word was presented for 2 seconds on a tablet computer. Subsequently, 30 words, including 10 and 20 target and distraction words, respectively, were presented. We requested that the participants choose 10 target words immediately, and the trial was repeated three times. The average number of correct answers in the three trials yielded the total score for the immediate recognition task. For the delayed recall score, we asked the participants to recall the 10 target words after approximately 20 minutes. The high test-retest reliability and moderate-to-high validity of the NCGG-FAT have been confirmed in community-dwelling older adults.19)

Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Since the data were not normally distributed, we used the Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests (for sex and smoking status) to compare data between participants with and without hyposmia (OE test ≤6 and ≥7, respectively). We also tested the differences between participants with (TS test ≤8) and without (TS test ≥9) hypogeusia. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to test the simple associations between age, olfactory function, gustatory function, and memory test performance. We tested the associations of hyposmia and hypogeusia with memory function using logistic regression analyses, with hyposmia (OE test ≤6) and hypogeusia (TS test ≤8) as dependent variables, and memory performance scores (immediate recognition and delayed recall) as independent variables. The odds ratios (ORs) for hyposmia and hypogeusia in the memory performance tests were adjusted for age, sex, education, and smoking status. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The participant demographics are reported in Table 1. The mean (interquartile range) age of the participants was 74.0 (70.0–79.0) years and 66.4% were female.
Participants with hyposmia (OE test ≤6) were significantly older and had lower memory performance scores for immediate recognition and delayed recall compared with participants without hyposmia. Sex and smoking status but not memory performance differed significantly between participants with (TS test ≤8) and without hypogeusia (Table 2).
Table 3 shows the correlations among age, olfactory function, gustatory function, and memory. We observed significant simple correlations between OE test scores and age (Spearman's ρ=-0.292, p<0.001), immediate recognition (Spearman's ρ=0.327, p<0.001), and delayed recall (Spearman's ρ=0.295, p<0.001). TS test scores were not significantly correlated with age, immediate recognition, or delayed recall. In addition, we observed no significant correlation between OE and TS test scores (Spearman's ρ=0.150, p=0.083).
Table 4 presents the results of the multivariate logistic regression models. Improved performance scores for immediate recognition were significantly associated with hyposmia after controlling for age, sex, education, and smoking status (adjusted OR=0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–0.90). An improved delayed recall performance score was associated with hyposmia, however the association was not statistically significant after controlling for covariates (adjusted OR=0.89; 95% CI 0.72–1.10). The results of multivariate logistic regression analyses showed no significant association between hypogeusia and memory.

DISCUSSION

The primary finding of this study was the association of poor memory scores with olfactory impairment. However, taste function and memory were not associated in independent community-dwelling older adults. Even in a relatively healthy aging stage, olfactory impairment may be associated with lower memory performance but not taste function.
Sensory systems, including taste and smell, are affected by aging. Sensory impairment progresses slowly with advancing age, and smell and taste deficits are highly prevalent in older adults.20) Impaired sensory function affects quality of life in older people.21) For instance, olfactory impairment complicates danger detection in our environment (e.g., gas, smoke, and spoiled food),22) while taste impairment increases the risk of foodborne illnesses, alter food choices, impairing nutritional status, and elevate the risk of allergic reactions.23) Olfactory impairment may also be a marker related to age-associated frailty status, such as sarcopenia24) and brain shrinking.16) Our findings demonstrated an association between olfactory function and memory. The current observational study could not assess these mechanisms, although olfactory loss could reflect age-related changes in the physiological system that are more sensitive than gustatory function.
A previous study analyzing data from a nationally representative sample of older adults reported that gustatory dysfunction was associated with dementia, while olfactory dysfunction was associated with MCI and dementia.25) In addition, middle-aged and older individuals with gustatory and olfactory dysfunction had worse global cognitive function than either alone.26) Herein, we observed no significant association between taste function and memory, while olfactory dysfunction was related to memory function. Those results confirmed the associations between poor memory function and olfactory impairment in the early stage of age-related sensory dysfunction.
Several interventional studies including older adults,27) MCI,28) and dementia29) have examined the effects of olfactory training on brain function. These intervention studies demonstrated the positive effects of training the sense of smell to improve olfactory function; however, the interventions showed a limited effect on cognition. A randomized controlled trial which conducted intensive olfactory training twice daily for 15 days (30 sessions) to older adults with dementia reported improved memory.29) Neurofibrillary tangles in the olfactory bulb and the projection pathways from the olfactory bulb to the secondary olfactory brain regions are the earliest pathological features of AD and a damaged olfaction.30) Despite evidence from well-designed intervention studies, training and improvement in olfactory function may positively impact the prevention of cognitive decline.
Olfactory and gustatory functions are essential in the activities of daily living in older people. For instance, the loss of olfactory function may lead to poor flavor perception, reduced food enjoyment, reduced appetite, and difficulties with cooking as well as detection of spoiled food.31,32) The loss of gustatory function may lead to health consequences such as metabolic syndrome through unhealthy dietary patterns.32) In addition, olfactory function and physical activity are strongly related, with better olfactory performance observed in older adults with active lifestyles.33) An active lifestyle is an important protective factor that reduces the risk of cognitive deficits. Therefore, the interaction with lifestyle indicated an association between olfactory function and memory. Thus, the association between gustatory function and lifestyle may be limited in older adults.
This study has several limitations. First, causal inferences could not be made because of the cross-sectional study design. Future longitudinal studies should investigate how changes in memory over time are associated with changes in olfactory and gustatory function. Second, other cognitive aspects such as attention, executive function, and spatial perception should be considered. Third, although specific tests for olfactory and gustatory functions were conducted, odor sensitivity and identification may have different characteristics and roles in older adults.34) Finally, more possible factors associated with order and taste function, such as comorbidities,35) socioeconomic status,36) and dietary intake37) should be considered to comprehensively understand the association of olfactory and gustatory function with memory.
In conclusion, community-dwelling, independent older adults with poor olfactory function had lower memory performance scores. While olfactory dysfunction was related to memory function, we observed no significant association between taste function and memory. Our findings suggest that memory function may be closely associated with olfactory impairment but not with gustatory function in this population. Thus, older adults showing loss of olfactory function should be carefully observed. Additional research is needed to determine the specific role of olfactory and gustatory functions in memory in older adults.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Mr. Kazutoshi Tomioka, PT; Ms. Ayumi Wada, PT; and Ms. Nana Sato, PT, for their help with data acquisition and Dr. Osamu Iritani, MD, for his thoughtful comments on a previous draft of the manuscript. In addition, we thank the participants for their enthusiasm in volunteering for this study, and all the staff at Tarumizu City for their assistance in performing the assessments.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

FUNDING

This work was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (Grant No. 18dk0207027h0003).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization, HM, SM; Data curation, HM, YN, SA, YT; Investigation, HM, YN, SA, YT; Methodology: HM, YN; Project administration: HM, YN, SM; Supervision, TM, SM; Writing–original draft: HM; Writing–review & editing: YN, SA, YT, TM, SM.

Table 1.
Participant demographics (n=134)
Value
Age (y) 74.0 (70.0–79.0)
Sex, female 89 (66.4)
Education (y) 12.0 (9.0–12.0)
Medical history
 Hypertension 78 (58.2)
 Hyperlipidemia 34 (25.4)
 Diabetes mellitus 15 (11.2)
 Arthritis 4 (3.0)
 Osteoporosis 3 (2.2)
Medications per day 4.0 (2.0–6.89)

Values are presented as mean (interquartile range) or number (%).

Table 2.
Comparisons of characteristics between participants with hyposmia or hypogeusia and those without
Overall Odor function
Taste function
Hyposmia (OE test ≤6) Non-hyposmia (OE test ≥7) p-value Hypogeusia (TS test ≤8) Non-hypogeusia (TS test ≥9) p-value
Number of participants 134 51 83 41 93
Age (y) 74.0 (70.0–79.0) 77.0 (7.0.0–81.0) 72.0 (69.0–77.0) <0.01 74.0 (70.0–80.0) 74.0 (70.0–78.5) 0.89
Sex, female 89 (66.4) 31 (60.8) 58 (69.9) 0.28 19 (46.3) 70 (75.3) <0.01
Education (y) 12.0 (9.0–12.0) 12.0 (9.0–12.0) 12.0 (9.0–13.0) 0.15 12.0 (9.0–12.0) 12.0 (9.0–12.5) 0.57
Smokers (current and ever) 32 (23.9) 14 (27.5) 18 (21.7) 0.45 15 (36.6) 17 (18.3) 0.02
Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.6 (20.7–24.9) 22.6 (20.3–24.9) 22.6 (20.8–24.9) 1.00 23.0 (20.6–25.5) 22.5 (20.7–24.3) 0.48
Memory (score)
 Immediate recognition 8.2 (7.3–9.0) 7.3 (6.3–8.7) 8.7 (7.3–9.0) <0.01 8.0 (7.0–9.0) 8.3 (7.3–9.0) 0.34
 Delayed recall 5.0 (4.0–6.0) 5.0 (3.0–6.0) 6.0 (4.0–7.0) 0.02 5.0 (3.0–6.0) 5.0 (4.0–7.0) 0.43

Values are presented as mean (interquartile range) or number (%).

OE, open essence; TS, taste strips.

Table 3.
Correlation coefficients (Spearman's ρ) between age, olfactory function, gustatory function, and memory (n=134)
Age Olfactory function (OE test) Gustatory function (TS test) Memory (immediate recognition) Memory (delayed recall)
Age 1.000 - - - -
Olfactory function (OE test) -0.292** 1.000 - - -
Gustatory function (TS test) -0.069 0.150 1.000 - -
Memory (immediate recognition) -0.378** 0.327** 0.134 1.0-00 -
Memory (delayed recall) -0.325** 0.295** 0.067 0.589** 1.000

** p<0.001.

Table 4.
Logistic regression assessing association of hyposmia and hypogeusia with memory
Hyposmia (OE test ≤6)
Hypogeusia (TS test ≤8)
Crude
Adjusted
Crude
Adjusted
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Memory (immediate recognition) 0.57 (0.42–0.77) <0.01 0.65 (0.47–0.90) 0.01 0.84 (0.64–1.11) 0.21 0.88 (0.63–1.21) 0.42
Memory (delayed recall) 0.80 (0.66–0.97) 0.02 0.89 (0.72–1.10) 0.29 0.91 (0.75–1.10) 0.31 0.94 (0.76–1.18) 0.60

Adjusted for age, sex, education, and smoking status.

OE, open essence; TS, taste strips; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

REFERENCES

1. Mesholam RI, Moberg PJ, Mahr RN, Doty RL. Olfaction in neurodegenerative disease: a meta-analysis of olfactory functioning in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Arch Neurol 1998;55:84–90.
crossref pmid
2. Yoon JH, Kim M, Moon SY, Yong SW, Hong JM. Olfactory function and neuropsychological profile to differentiate dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a 5-year follow-up study. J Neurol Sci 2015;355:174–9.
crossref pmid
3. Ogawa T, Irikawa N, Yanagisawa D, Shiino A, Tooyama I, Shimizu T. Taste detection and recognition thresholds in Japanese patients with Alzheimer-type dementia. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017;44:168–73.
crossref pmid
4. Steinbach S, Hundt W, Vaitl A, Heinrich P, Forster S, Burger K, et al. Taste in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol 2010;257:238–46.
crossref pmid pdf
5. Kouzuki M, Ichikawa J, Shirasagi D, Katsube F, Kobashi Y, Matsumoto H, et al. Detection and recognition thresholds for five basic tastes in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia. BMC Neurol 2020;20:110.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Kouzuki M, Suzuki T, Nagano M, Nakamura S, Katsumata Y, Takamura A, et al. Comparison of olfactory and gustatory disorders in Alzheimer's disease. Neurol Sci 2018;39:321–8.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Murphy C, Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Nondahl DM. Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. JAMA 2002;288:2307–12.
crossref pmid
8. Hawkes C. Olfaction in neurodegenerative disorder. Mov Disord 2003;18:364–72.
crossref pmid
9. Park KA, Lee HJ, Park MS, Lee JH, Cheon SE, Kim JS, et al. Studies on alterations in taste perception of Korean elderly. J Korean Geriatr Soc 2002;6:299–310.

10. Maioli F, Coveri M, Pagni P, Chiandetti C, Marchetti C, Ciarrocchi R, et al. Conversion of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in elderly subjects: a preliminary study in a memory and cognitive disorder unit. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2007;44 Suppl 1:233–41.
crossref pmid
11. Wilson DA, Stevenson RJ. The fundamental role of memory in olfactory perception. Trends Neurosci 2003;26:243–7.
crossref pmid
12. Doorduijn AS, de van der Schueren MA, van de Rest O, de Leeuw FA, Fieldhouse JLP, Kester MI, et al. Olfactory and gustatory functioning and food preferences of patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment compared to controls: the NUDAD project. J Neurol 2020;267:144–52.
crossref pmid pdf
13. Makizako H, Kubozono T, Kiyama R, Takenaka T, Kuwahata S, Tabira T, et al. Associations of social frailty with loss of muscle mass and muscle weakness among community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019;19:76–80.
crossref pmid pdf
14. Noh JH, Jung HW, Ga H, Lim JY. Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2022;26:1–3.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
15. Okutani F, Hirose K, Kobayashi T, Kaba H, Hyodo M. Evaluation of "Open Essence" odor-identification test card by application to healthy volunteers. Auris Nasus Larynx 2013;40:76–80.
crossref pmid
16. Iritani O, Okuno T, Miwa T, Makizako H, Okutani F, Kashibayashi T, et al. Olfactory-cognitive index distinguishes involvement of frontal lobe shrinkage, as in sarcopenia from shrinkage of medial temporal areas, and global brain, as in Kihon Checklist frailty/dependence, in older adults with progression of normal cognition to Alzheimer's disease. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021;21:291–8.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A, Bende M, Mueller CA, Nordin S, et al. "Taste Strips": rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 2009;256:242–8.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Solemdal K, Sandvik L, Willumsen T, Mowe M. Taste ability in hospitalised older people compared with healthy, age-matched controls. Gerodontology 2014;31:42–8.
crossref pmid
19. Makizako H, Shimada H, Park H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Uemura K, et al. Evaluation of multidimensional neurocognitive function using a tablet personal computer: test-retest reliability and validity in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013;13:860–6.
crossref pmid
20. Kaneda H, Maeshima K, Goto N, Kobayakawa T, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Saito S. Decline in taste and odor discrimination abilities with age, and relationship between gustation and olfaction. Chem Senses 2000;25:331–7.
crossref pmid
21. Fischer ME, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Schubert CR, Wiley TL. Multiple sensory impairment and quality of life. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2009;16:346–53.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Croy I, Nordin S, Hummel T. Olfactory disorders and quality of life--an updated review. Chem Senses 2014;39:185–94.
crossref pmid
23. Schiffman SS. Effects of aging on the human taste system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1170:725–9.
crossref pmid
24. Harita M, Miwa T, Shiga H, Yamada K, Sugiyama E, Okabe Y, et al. Association of olfactory impairment with indexes of sarcopenia and frailty in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019;19:384–91.
crossref pmid pdf
25. Churnin I, Qazi J, Fermin CR, Wilson JH, Payne SC, Mattos JL. Association between olfactory and gustatory dysfunction and cognition in older adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2019;33:170–7.
crossref pmid pdf
26. Mattos JL, Hasan S, Schlosser RJ, Payne SC, Soler ZM. The association of gustatory dysfunction, olfactory dysfunction, and cognition in older adults. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023;13:1577–83.
crossref pmid pdf
27. Birte-Antina W, Ilona C, Antje H, Thomas H. Olfactory training with older people. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2018;33:212–20.
crossref pmid pdf
28. Chen B, Espin M, Haussmann R, Matthes C, Donix M, Hummel T, et al. The effect of olfactory training on olfaction, cognition, and brain function in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 2022;85:745–54.
crossref pmid
29. Cha H, Kim S, Kim H, Kim G, Kwon KY. Effect of intensive olfactory training for cognitive function in patients with dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022;22:5–11.
crossref pmid pdf
30. Kovacs T. Mechanisms of olfactory dysfunction in aging and neurodegenerative disorders. Ageing Res Rev 2004;3:215–32.
crossref pmid
31. Nordin S, Blomqvist EH, Olsson P, Stjärne P, Ehnhage A; NAF2S2 Study Group. Effects of smell loss on daily life and adopted coping strategies in patients with nasal polyposis with asthma. Acta Otolaryngol 2011;131:826–32.
crossref pmid
32. Miwa T, Furukawa M, Tsukatani T, Costanzo RM, DiNardo LJ, Reiter ER. Impact of olfactory impairment on quality of life and disability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:497–503.
crossref pmid
33. Sollai G, Crnjar R. Age-related olfactory decline is associated with levels of exercise and non-exercise physical activities. Front Aging Neurosci 2021;13:695115.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Xu L, Liu J, Wroblewski KE, McClintock MK, Pinto JM. Odor sensitivity versus odor identification in older US adults: associations with cognition, age, gender, and race. Chem Senses 2020;45:321–30.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
35. Gong L, Xie J, Liu J, Tang G, Lin W, Zhang Z. Olfactory dysfunction is a risk factor for the comorbidity of mild cognitive impairment and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2021;46:831–7.
pmid pmc
36. Fornazieri MA, Doty RL, Bezerra TF, de Rezende Pinna F, Costa FO, Voegels RL, et al. Relationship of socioeconomic status to olfactory function. Physiol Behav 2019;198:84–9.
crossref pmid
37. Jeon S, Kim Y, Min S, Song M, Son S, Lee S. Taste sensitivity of elderly people is associated with quality of life and inadequate dietary intake. Nutrients 2021;13:1693.
crossref pmid pmc


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article Category

Browse all articles >

TOPICS

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#401 Yuksam Hyundai Venturetel, 20, Teheran-ro 25-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06132, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2269-1039    Fax: +82-2-2269-1040    E-mail: agmr.editorial@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Geriatrics Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next