Ann Geriatr Med Res Search

CLOSE


Ann Geriatr Med Res > Volume 24(1); 2020 > Article
Lee, Jung, Jang, Moon, Lee, and Han: Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden as a Predictive Factor for In-hospital Mortality in Older Patients in Korea

Abstract

Background

With the increasing prevalence of chronic disease due to aging, many older adults experience multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Medications with anticholinergic properties are particularly associated with adverse cognitive outcomes, including functional decline and mortality. We assessed the clinical impact of anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) on clinical outcomes of older patients acutely admitted to a single, hospitalist-operated medical unit of a tertiary hospital in Korea.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed electronic medical records of 318 patients aged 65 years or older admitted to the hospitalist-operated medical unit through the emergency department of Seoul National University Hospital. The analyzed clinical outcomes were the length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, unplanned intensive care unit admission, and unexpected readmission within 30 days.

Results

The clinical outcomes did not differ between patients who took five or more drugs and those who did not. Patients with an ACB score of 3 or higher had a higher in-hospital mortality rate and longer hospital stay than those who did not. After adjusting for confounding factors, an ACB score of 3 or higher was an independent predictive factor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio=3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–8.06).

Conclusion

ACB rather than the number of medications was associated with in-hospital mortality in acutely ill older patients. Further analytic and interventional studies are required to assess potentially inappropriate medication use and ACB in older inpatients.

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing prevalence of chronic disease with aging, many older adults are treated concurrently for two or more diseases, a condition commonly referred to as a state of multimorbidity.1,2) A recent report indicated that the prevalence of multimorbidity in Korea is up to 73%,3) predominantly due to common diseases such as hypertension, osteoarthritis, and hyperlipidemia. Since medical management for these conditions requires medications for specific diseases, older adults with multimorbidity are likely to take multiple medications simultaneously. Consequently, polypharmacy, a geriatric condition defined as taking multiple medications (usually five or more per day), is a frequently encountered clinical condition in medical care for older adults.4,5)
Medical care for older patients, especially those with polypharmacy, should consider factors such as prescribing cascade, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for older adults.6-9) Among these factors, the presence of PIMs is reportedly associated with increased adverse outcomes, including delirium, falls, functional decline, and mortality. Therefore, guidelines have recommended to reduce the use of or to replace PIMs with safer alternatives.8-10) Moreover, the concept of deprescribing, an individualized therapeutic strategy that considers the risks and benefits of medications according to patient functional and comorbid status, has emerged with efforts to minimize adverse outcomes with polypharmacy.11)
PIMs include a wide range of medications with anticholinergic properties affecting the cognitive states of older patients.8,12) Clinical evidence has shown associations between these medications and adverse cognitive outcomes,13) backed by evident scientific knowledge of the importance of acetylcholine signaling in cognitive performance.14,15) Accordingly, varying clinical measures to quantify anticholinergic cognitive burden (ACB) have been developed and validated.13,16,17)
Older patients admitted through the emergency department in tertiary hospitals tend to have multimorbidity and polypharmacy, suggesting high exposure to anticholinergic medications in this population that may lead to adverse outcomes.18,19) However, to our knowledge, no study has focused on ACB in acutely admitted older patients in Korea. Therefore, we assessed the clinical impact of ACB on clinical outcomes of older patients admitted via the emergency department of a single, hospitalist-operated medical unit of a tertiary hospital in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical Setting and Study Design

This retrospective study reviewed the electronic medical records at Seoul National University Hospital. We first searched for patients discharged from the hospitalist-operated medical unit at Seoul National University Hospital between February 2018 and October 2019. Among these patients, we included those 65 years of age and older admitted through the emergency department. To focus on acutely ill patients, we excluded patients admitted from the outpatient department and who were transferred from other wards, including the intensive care unit (ICU).
This study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (No. H-1911-089-1079), which waived informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Measurement of ACB

Regular medications were assumed to be all the drugs regularly taken by each patient before hospitalization. We collected data on regular medications from each patient to check for polypharmacy and assessed the ACB by reviewing the patients’ regular medications and those prescribed during hospitalization. Each patient’s ACB score was calculated by summing the score according to the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale.17)

Data Collections and Outcome Measures

Demographic data such as sex and age and data on medical history were collected to calculate the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). To assess the condition severity at the time of admission, vital signs and laboratory test results were also collected. Length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, unplanned ICU admission, and unexpected readmission within 30 days were analyzed as clinical outcomes.

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD) or numbers (percentage) unless stated otherwise. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, while continuous variables were compared by Student t-tests. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify factors significantly influencing clinical outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression was performed with those factors to determine the independent predictive factors of ward mortality and delirium. Two-tailed p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in the Study Population

This study included 318 patients. Among them, the mean age was 74.9±6.8 years and 205 patients (64.5%) were men. A total of 240 patients (75.5%) were taking five or more drugs and the mean ACB score was 3.1 points. The proportions of patients with hypertension, diabetes, and malignancy were 47.5%, 38.7%, and 71.1%, respectively. Multimorbidity, defined as the co-existence of two or more chronic illnesses, was present in 208 patients (65.4%) and mean the CCI was 7.5±2.6 points. Regarding clinical outcomes, the in-hospital mortality and readmission rates within 30 days were 9.1% (29 patients) and 7.2% (23 patients), respectively. The mean LOS in the study population was 13.6±10.3 days. Finally, 8 patients entered the ICU unexpectedly (Table 1).

Comparisons of Patients according to the Number of Concurrent Regular Medications

Patients taking five or more regular medications were categorized into the polypharmacy group. Age did not differ between the two groups. The proportion of men was higher in the polypharmacy group than that in the non-polypharmacy group (68.3 vs. 52.6%; p=0.011). Mean ACB and CCI score were higher in the polypharmacy group than those in the non-polypharmacy group (3.2±2.7 vs. 2.5±2.1 and 7.7±2.6 vs. 7.0±2.6, respectively). More patients in the polypharmacy group had hypertension, diabetes, angina, and chronic kidney disease. Admission vital signs except for respiratory rate were similar between groups. Serum creatinine level on admission was higher in the polypharmacy group, although blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) did not significantly differ between the two groups. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between the two groups for in-hospital mortality, readmission rate, mean LOS, and unexpected ICU admission (Table 2).

Comparisons of Patients according to ACB

High ACB, defined as an ACB score of 3 or higher, was observed in 156 patients (49.1%). Patients with high ACB scores were taking more concurrent regular medications than patients without high ACB scores (mean number of medications, 9.0±5.0 vs. 7.8±5.0; p=0.028). Chronic kidney disease as an underlying illness was more common in patients with high ACB score. There were no differences in age, sex, CCI score, or admission vital signs between groups. Patients with high ACB score had lower serum albumin levels. Patients with an ACB score of 3 or higher also showed a higher in-hospital mortality rate (14.1 vs. 4.3%; p=0.002) and longer hospital stays (mean LOS, 16.2±11.6 vs. 11.2±8.2 days; p<0.001) than those who did not. No differences in the proportions of readmission within 30 days or unplanned ICU admissions were observed between groups (Table 3).

Anticholinergic Burden as an Independent Predictive Factor for In-hospital Mortality

Univariate regression analyses for all variables revealed factors such as CCI score, high ACB, admission pulse rate, and serum albumin and BUN level on admission to be associated with in-hospital mortality. Age, sex, or five or more regular medications did not predict in-hospital mortality. After adjusting for confounding factors, an ACB score of 3 or higher remained an independent predictive factor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]=3.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–8.06). Moreover, one-point increment in CCI score (OR=1.35; 95% CI, 1.12–1.63), one beat per minute increment in pulse rate (OR=1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.07), and 1-g/dL increment in serum albumin level (OR=0.36; 95% CI, 0.16–0.83) were also associated with in-hospital mortality (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found that older patients admitted via the emergency department had a high prevalence of polypharmacy and were also heavily exposed to medications with anticholinergic properties. Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that ACB and not polypharmacy, per se, was associated with in-hospital mortality. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the association between ACB and in-hospital mortality in acutely ill patients in Korea.
As the vast majority of commonly prescribed medications retain anticholinergic properties and also have biologic effects on cognitive performance, studies have evaluated the associations between anticholinergic exposure and clinical outcomes in older patients. Although long-term anticholinergic exposure and cognitive decline have been reported, controversies remain regarding the relevance of the short-term outcomes of ACB. Although a large-scale study showed an association between anticholinergic exposure and 2-year mortality,20) studies on in-hospital mortality indicated no definite adverse effect of anticholinergic exposure.21,22) In our study, ACB remained a significant predictor of mortality even after adjusting for comorbidity burden and polypharmacy.
Several possible mechanisms may explain the relationship between ACB and in-hospital mortality. Delirium, an important and preventable geriatric condition in hospitalized older adults, might be a mediator, as shown in studies on anticholinergic exposure, delirium, and mortality. For instance, a study from an acute care hospital in Canada reported delirium severity to be associated with a clinical-rated anticholinergic score.23) Another study from the United States including patients receiving palliative care showed a similar association between anticholinergic exposure according to an anticholinergic risk scale and delirium incidence.24) Both short-term and long-term time associations between delirium and mortality risk have been demonstrated.25,26) Unfortunately, as a retrospective study, we did not include delirium as a study variable because medical record review may fail to capture hypoactive delirium, which is reportedly worse in terms of clinical outcome.
The population in the present study had a relatively higher prevalence of polypharmacy with substantial ACB compared to those in previous studies in other countries on older acute patients.22,27,28) There may be several explanations for this difference. Firstly, the study population in the present study was inpatients admitted to an acute unit of a top-tier hospital in Korea, with a predictably high comorbidity burden. Secondly, the concepts of anticholinergic medications and PIMs are relatively unrecognized in Korea. Although Korea is experiencing an extreme pace of population aging, the concept of geriatric medicine is rarely taught in medical schools.29) Thirdly, specialized or fragmented care for older multimorbid patients might contribute to the occurrence of prescribing cascades that often involve PIMs.30) While our retrospective, descriptive study cannot address the contributions of these factors that may affect PIM and ACB in older patients with multimorbidities, our findings underscore the need for further research on the current nationwide status of medication usage in older adults.
As a retrospective observation performed by medical record review, our study has several limitations. Since our observations were based on the medical records of patients admitted to a single, hospitalist-run medical unit in a tertiary hospital, the characteristics of the patients in our study are not generalizable to the older population nationwide in Korea. Furthermore, our study lacks important geriatric baseline parameters including frailty, cognitive function, and daily functioning, and relevant outcome variables of ACB such as delirium and falls. Similarly, the functional outcomes of patients after discharge were unavailable in this study. Based on the results of this hypothesis-generating study, our upcoming prospective study with an interventional arm deprescribing PIMs and minimizing anticholinergic burden will provide better answers on the mediating mechanisms between ACB and clinical adverse outcomes.
In conclusion, ACB but not polypharmacy was associated with in-hospital mortality in acutely ill older patients. We hope that the results of this study lead to further analytic and interventional studies on PIMs and ACB in older inpatients.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The researchers claim no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization, HWJ; Data curation, SM, SL, SJH; Investigation JHL, HWJ, IYJ; Methodology. JHL, HWJ, IYJ, SJH; Project administration, HWJ; Supervision, SJH; Writing-original draft, JHL, HWJ; Writing, review & Editing, SJH.

Table 1.
Study population baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes (n=318)
Variable Value
Age (y) 74.9±6.8
Men 205 (64.5)
Polypharmacya) 240 (75.5)
Non-polypharmacy 78 (24.5)
Number of regular medications 8.4±5.0
ACB score 3.1±2.5
CCI score 7.5±2.6
Multimorbidity 208 (65.4)
Underlying illness
 Hypertension 151 (47.5)
 Diabetes 123 (38.7)
 Malignancy 226 (71.1)
 Chronic lung disease 38 (11.9)
 History of myocardial infarction 9 (2.8)
 Heart failure 31 (9.7)
 Angina 30 (9.4)
 Asthma 13 (4.1)
 Arthritis 30 (9.4)
 Stroke 25 (7.9)
 Chronic kidney disease 47 (14.8)
Vital signs upon admission
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 126.0±22.0
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 73.2±12.4
 Pulse rate (per minute) 88.2±16.6
 Respiratory rate (per minute) 21.4±3.2
 Body temperature (°C) 36.9±0.6
Initial laboratory results upon admission
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 10.3±2.3
 Serum albumin (g/dL) 3.0±0.6
 Serum BUN (mg/dL) 26.3±19.9
 Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 1.3±1.3
 eGFRb) (mL/min/1.73 m2) 75.1±39.0
 Serum sodium (mmol/L) 135.8±9.7
Clinical outcomes
 Length of stay (day) 13.6±10.3
 In-hospital mortality 29 (9.1)
 Readmission within 30 days 23 (7.2)
 Unplanned ICU admission 8 (2.5)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

ACB, anticholinergic cognitive burden; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICU, intensive care unit.

a) Patients taking five or more concurrent regular medications.

b) Based on the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation.

Table 2.
Comparisons of patients according to the numbers of concurrent regular medications
Variable Polypharmacya) (n=240) Non-polypharmacy (n=78) p-value
Age (y) 75.0±6.6 74.8±7.3 0.798
Men 164 (68.3) 41 (52.6) 0.011
ACB score 3.2 ± 2.7 2.5 ± 2.1 0.037
CCI score 7.7 ± 2.6 7.0 ± 2.6 0.037
Underlying illness
 Hypertension 123 (51.3) 28 (35.9) 0.018
 Diabetes 108 (45.0) 15 (19.2) <0.001
 Malignancy 168 (70.0) 58 (74.4) 0.461
 Chronic lung disease 31 (12.9) 7 (9.0) 0.351
 History of myocardial infarction 9 (3.8) 0 0.119
 Heart failure 27 (11.3) 4 (5.1) 0.129
 Angina 30 (12.5) 0 0.001
 Asthma 10 (4.2) 3 (3.8) >0.999
 Arthritis 26 (10.8) 4 (5.1) 0.181
 Stroke 21 (8.8) 4 (5.1) 0.467
 Chronic kidney disease 43 (17.9) 4 (5.1) 0.005
Vital signs upon admission
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 127.1±22.7 122.7±19.6 0.123
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 73.5±12.3 72.1±12.8 0.380
 Pulse rate (per minute) 88.6±16.2 86.6±17.8 0.358
 Respiratory rate (per minute) 21.6±3.5 20.8±2.0 0.013
 Body temperature (°C) 36.9±0.6 36.9±0.7 0.673
Initial laboratory results upon admission
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 10.4±2.3 10.3±2.4 0.915
 Serum albumin (g/dL) 3.0±0.6 3.0±0.6 0.909
 Serum BUN (mg/dL) 27.6±20.3 23.1±18.7 0.107
 Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 1.4±1.4 1.1±0.9 0.017
 eGFRb) (mL/min/1.73 m2) 73.0±40.3 81.5±34.5 0.097
 Serum sodium (mmol/L) 135.4±10.7 137.3±5.6 0.120
Clinical outcomes
 Length of stay (day) 13.5±9.3 14.0±13.0 0.734
 In-hospital mortality 24 (10.0) 5 (6.4) 0.497
 Readmission within 30 days 20 (8.3) 3 (3.8) 0.218
 Unplanned ICU admission 8 (3.3) 0 (0) 0.207

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

ACB, anticholinergic cognitive burden; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICU, intensive care unit.

a) Patients taking five or more concurrent regular medications.

b) Based on the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation.

Table 3.
Comparisons of patients according to ACB scores
Variable High ACBa) (n=156) Low ACB (n=162) p-value
Age (y) 75.3±6.4 74.5±7.2 0.289
Men 108 (69.2) 97 (59.9) 0.081
Number of regular medications 9.0±5.0 7.8±5.0 0.028
CCI score 7.8±2.6 7.3±2.6 0.091
Underlying illness
 Hypertension 74 (47.4) 77 (47.5) 0.986
 Diabetes 63 (40.4) 60 (37.0) 0.540
 Malignancy 109 (69.9) 117 (72.2) 0.644
 Chronic lung disease 17 (10.9) 21 (13.0) 0.570
 History of myocardial infarction 5 (3.2) 4 (2.5) 0.746
 Heart failure 20 (12.8) 11 (6.8) 0.070
 Angina 16 (10.3) 14 (8.6) 0.622
 Asthma 6 (3.8) 7 (4.3) 0.831
 Arthritis 13 (8.3) 17 (10.5) 0.510
 Stroke 15 (9.6) 10 (6.2) 0.254
 Chronic kidney disease 31 (19.9) 16 (9.9) 0.012
Vital signs upon admission
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 126.0±21.8 126.0±22.3 0.982
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 72.5±12.1 73.8±12.8 0.350
 Pulse rate (per minute) 87.6±15.8 88.6±17.3 0.590
 Respiratory rate (per minute) 21.6±3.8 21.3±2.4 0.364
 Body temperature (°C) 36.9±0.6 36.9±0.6 0.574
Initial laboratory results upon admission
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 10.1±2.2 10.6±2.4 0.084
 Serum albumin (g/dL) 2.9±0.6 3.1±0.6 0.001
 Serum BUN (mg/dL) 27.6±21.7 25.0±18.0 0.252
 Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 1.4±1.3 1.3±1.3 0.532
 eGFRb) (mL/min/1.73 m2) 74.8±43.4 75.4± 34.4 0.900
 Serum sodium (mmol/L) 135.5±12.1 136.1±6.7 0.581
Clinical outcomes
 Length of stay (day) 16.2±11.6 11.2±8.2 <0.001
 In-hospital mortality 22 (14.1) 7 (4.3) 0.002
 Readmission within 30 days 14 (9.0) 9 (5.6) 0.239
 Unplanned ICU admission 4 (2.6) 4 (2.5) >0.999

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

ACB, anticholinergic cognitive burden; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICU, intensive care unit.

a) Patients with an ACB score of 3 or higher.

b) Based on the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation.

Table 4.
Predictive factors of in-hospital mortality
Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
Age (1-year increment) 1.03 0.98–1.09 0.275 1.03 0.97–1.10 0.373
Men 1.82 0.75–4.40 0.184 0.83 0.31–2.25 0.717
Five or more regular medications 1.62 0.60–4.41 0.343 1.17 0.38–3.56 0.788
ACB score of 3 or higher 3.64 1.51–8.78 0.004 3.09 1.18–8.06 0.021
CCI (1-point increment) 1.38 1.17–1.62 <0.001 1.35 1.12–1.63 0.001
Pulse rate (increment by 1 bpm) 1.03 1.01–1.06 0.006 1.04 1.01–1.07 0.006
Serum albumin (1-g/dL increment) 0.24 0.11–0.51 <0.001 0.36 0.16–0.83 0.018
BUN (1-mg/dL increment) 1.02 1.00–1.03 0.037 1.01 1.00–1.03 0.118

ACB, anticholinergic cognitive burden; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; bpm, beats per minute; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

REFERENCES

1. Jung HW, Kim KI. Multimorbidity in older adults. J Korean Geriatr Soc 2014;18:65–71.
crossref pdf
2. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10:430–9.
crossref pmid
3. Jang IY, Lee HY, Lee E. Geriatrics fact sheet in Korea 2018 from national statistics. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2019;23:50–3.
crossref pdf
4. Kojima T. The need for actions against polypharmacy in older people with frailty. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2018;22:111–6.
crossref pdf
5. Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2007;5:345–51.
crossref
6. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. Optimising drug treatment for elderly people: the prescribing cascade. BMJ 1997;315:1096–9.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. The prescribing cascade revisited. Lancet 2017;389:1778–80.
crossref pmid
8. By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67:674–94.
crossref pmid
9. Kim MY, Etherton-Beer C, Kim CB, Yoon JL, Ga H, Kim HC, et al. Development of a consensus list of potentially inappropriate medications for Korean older adults. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2018;22:121–9.
crossref pdf
10. Gallagher P, O'Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers' criteria. Age Ageing 2008;37:673–9.
crossref pdf
11. Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, Potter K, Le Couteur D, Rigby D, et al. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:827–34.
crossref pmid
12. Boustani M, Campbell N, Munger S, Maidment I, Fox C. Impact of anticholinergics on the aging brain: a review and practical application. Aging Health 2008;4:311–20.
crossref
13. Salahudeen MS, Hilmer SN, Nishtala PS. Comparison of anticholinergic risk scales and associations with adverse health outcomes in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;63:85–90.
crossref
14. Feinberg M. The problems of anticholinergic adverse effects in older patients. Drugs Aging 1993;3:335–48.
crossref pmid
15. Blokland A. Acetylcholine: a neurotransmitter for learning and memory? Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1995;21:285–300.
crossref pmid
16. Duran CE, Azermai M, Vander Stichele RH. Systematic review of anticholinergic risk scales in older adults. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013;69:1485–96.
crossref pdf
17. Campbell N, Maidment I, Fox C, Khan B, Boustani M. C46: The 2012 update to the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61(S1):S142–3.

18. Hein C, Forgues A, Piau A, Sommet A, Vellas B, Nourhashemi F. Impact of polypharmacy on occurrence of delirium in elderly emergency patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15:850.
crossref
19. Samaras N, Chevalley T, Samaras D, Gold G. Older patients in the emergency department: a review. Ann Emerg Med 2010;56:261–9.
crossref pmid
20. Fox C, Richardson K, Maidment ID, Savva GM, Matthews FE, Smithard D, et al. Anticholinergic medication use and cognitive impairment in the older population: the medical research council cognitive function and ageing study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:1477–83.
crossref pmid
21. Dauphinot V, Faure R, Omrani S, Goutelle S, Bourguignon L, Krolak-Salmon P, et al. Exposure to anticholinergic and sedative drugs, risk of falls, and mortality: an elderly inpatient, multicenter cohort. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2014;34:565–70.
crossref pmid
22. Kidd AC, Musonda P, Soiza RL, Butchart C, Lunt CJ, Pai Y, et al. The relationship between total anticholinergic burden (ACB) and early in-patient hospital mortality and length of stay in the oldest old aged 90 years and over admitted with an acute illness. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2014;59:155–61.
crossref
23. Han L, McCusker J, Cole M, Abrahamowicz M, Primeau F, Elie M. Use of medications with anticholinergic effect predicts clinical severity of delirium symptoms in older medical inpatients. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1099–105.
crossref pmid
24. Zimmerman KM, Salow M, Skarf LM, Kostas T, Paquin A, Simone MJ, et al. Increasing anticholinergic burden and delirium in palliative care inpatients. Palliat Med 2014;28:335–41.
crossref pmid
25. van den Boogaard M, Peters SA, van der Hoeven JG, Dagnelie PC, Leffers P, Pickkers P, et al. The impact of delirium on the prediction of in-hospital mortality in intensive care patients. Crit Care 2010;14:R146.
crossref pmid pmc
26. van Hemert AM, van der Mast RC, Hengeveld MW, Vorstenbosch M. Excess mortality in general hospital patients with delirium: a 5-year follow-up of 519 patients seen in psychiatric consultation. J Psychosom Res 1994;38:339–46.
crossref pmid
27. Corsonello A, Pedone C, Corica F, Incalzi RA. Polypharmacy in elderly patients at discharge from the acute care hospital. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2007;3:197–203.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Mizokami F, Koide Y, Noro T, Furuta K. Polypharmacy with common diseases in hospitalized elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2012;10:123–8.
crossref
29. Jung HW, Lim JY. Geriatric medicine, an underrecognized solution of precision medicine for older adults in Korea. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2018;22:157–8.
crossref pdf
30. Gill SS, Mamdani M, Naglie G, Streiner DL, Bronskill SE, Kopp A, et al. A prescribing cascade involving cholinesterase inhibitors and anticholinergic drugs. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:808–13.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 4 Crossref
  • 3 Scopus
  • 3,191 View
  • 111 Download
Related articles in
Ann Geriatr Med Res


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article Category

Browse all articles >

TOPICS

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#401 Yuksam Hyundai Venturetel, 20, Teheran-ro 25-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06132, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2269-1039    Fax: +82-2-2269-1040    E-mail: agmr.editorial@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2022 by Korean Geriatrics Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next