Ann Geriatr Med Res Search

CLOSE


Ann Geriatr Med Res > Accepted Articles
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.26.0013    [Accepted]
Published online May 26, 2026.
Association between pressure ulcers and phase angle in older adults residing in long-term care facilities
Lu Yin1  , Yohei Sawaya2,3  , Tamaki Hirose2,3  , Takahiro Shiba1, Ryo Sato1, Keisuke Fukuda3, Kei Shibahara1, Tomohiko Urano1,3,4 
1Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-Term Care, Care Facility for the Elderly “Maronie-en,” Nasushiobara, Tochigi, Japan
2Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan
3Nishinasuno General Home Care Center, Department of Day Rehabilitation, Care Facility for the Elderly “Maronie-en,” Nasushiobara, Tochigi, Japan
4Department of Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Chiba, Japan
Correspondence:  Tomohiko Urano, Tel: +81-287-36-6622, Fax: +81-287-36-8510, 
Email: turanotky@gmail.com
Received: 20 January 2026   • Revised: 5 April 2026   • Accepted: 19 May 2026
Abstract
Background
In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between the presence of pressure ulcers and body composition parameters in older residents of long-term care facilities and identified the most relevant indicators.
Methods
This cross-sectional observational study assessed 156 residents. Body composition was measured, including body mass index (BMI) and phase angle (PhA). Functional assessments included the Barthel index (BI), and Clinical Frailty Scale. The participants were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of pressure ulcers. Group comparisons and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to determine the area under the curve (AUC) and cutoff values. The diagnostic performance of the combined cutoff values was also examined. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between PhA and the presence of pressure ulcers.
Results
Twenty (12.8%) participants had pressure ulcers, 90% of which were mild-stage. PhA was lower in the pressure ulcer group (p < 0.001), with an optimal cutoff value of 3.1° (AUC 0.72). Using the cutoff values derived from each assessment, the combination of PhA with BI or BMI improved the AUC to a maximum of 0.78. Logistic regression demonstrated a significant association between PhA and the presence of pressure ulcers (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
Phase angle may serve as a complementary biomarker for pressure ulcer risk assessment and may be more useful when combined with functional and nutritional indicators. The use of body composition parameters for noninvasive risk assessment could play an important role in future pressure ulcer prevention strategies.
Key Words: Pressure ulcer, Bioelectrical impedance analysis, Aged, Activities of daily living, Long-term care


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article Category

Browse all articles >

TOPICS

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#401 Yuksam Hyundai Venturetel, 20, Teheran-ro 25-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06132, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2269-1039    Fax: +82-2-2269-1040    E-mail: agmr.editorial@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Geriatrics Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next