Ann Geriatr Med Res Search

CLOSE


Ann Geriatr Med Res > Volume 29(1); 2025 > Article
Isngadi, Asmoro, Huda, Siswagama, Rehatta, Chandra, Sari, Lestari, Senapathi, Nurdin, Wirabuana, Pramodana, Pradhana, Anggraeni, Sikumbang, Halimi, Jasa, Nasution, Mochamat, and Purwoko: Preoperative Geriatric Characteristics Associated with Changes in Postoperative Cognitive Function and Quality of Life: A Prospective Observational Analytic Multicenter Study

Abstract

Background

Changes in cognitive function are associated with increased depression and decreased quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to determine the relationship between the characteristics of geriatric patients and anesthetic management with changes in postoperative cognitive function and QOL of geriatric patients undergoing elective surgery.

Methods

This prospective observational analytic multicenter study included patients aged ≥60 years who underwent elective surgery in hospitals in Indonesia. We used the whole sampling method and performed follow-up 30 days after surgery. Data were analyzed using bivariate chi-square and multivariate regression tests with a confidence interval of 95% and α=5%.

Results

Among the 933 geriatric patients included in this study 55.0%, females most (59.8%) received general anesthesia. Factors including age (p<0.001, B=-0.374, odds ratio [OR]=0.688), body mass index (BMI) (p<0.05, B=0.129, OR=1.138), and physical status based on American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (p<0.001, B=-0.458, OR=0.633) were significantly associated with postoperative cognitive function. BMI (p<0.001, B=-0.218, OR=1.244), absence of comorbidities (p<0.05, B=-0.312, OR=0.732), regional anesthesia (p<0.05, B=0.606, OR=1.883), and changes in cognitive function (p<0.05, B=0.288, OR=1.334) were significantly correlated with changes in postoperative QOL.

Conclusion

Age, BMI, and ASA physical status were significantly associated with postoperative cognitive function in geriatric patients, whereas BMI, comorbidities, regional anesthesia, and changes in postoperative cognitive function were associated with QOL. These preoperative factors can predict postoperative cognitive function and QOL and may be useful during preoperative planning.

INTRODUCTION

The global geriatric population aged ≥60 years is increasing faster than the other age groups and expected to triple from 600 million in 2000 to 2 billion in 2050 due to an increase in life expectancy and decrease in birth rates.1) For example, in Indonesia, the life expectancy of the population reached 67.8 years in 2000–2005 and 73.6 years in 2020–2025.2) By 2050, one-quarter of the Indonesian population will be classified as older adults, compared with one-twelfth of the current Indonesian population.3) With the increasing population of older adults, developing strategic plans for healthcare providers to increase the functional capacity and quality of life (QOL) of geriatric patients has become necessary.
In older people, aging causes a progressive decline in physiological and cognitive functions and an increased susceptibility to illness.4,5) In the geriatric population, cognitive function is related to perception, reasoning, creativity, problem-solving, and intuition.6) Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is characterized by a significant decline in cognitive performance, memory function, attention, verbal ability, orientation, and executive function.7) Changes in cognitive function tend to be significantly associated with increased depression and decreased QOL in patients.8) Geriatric patients also tend to have more comorbidities accompanied by decreased physiological and cognitive function.9) Moreover, aging contributes to physiological changes in the nervous system, cognition, memory, learning and intelligence, sensory and musculoskeletal systems, body composition, and body mass.10) The physiological changes also affect organ systems, resulting in decreased cardiac output, increased blood pressure, arteriosclerosis, decreased vital capacity, and slower lung expiratory flow rate. Additionally, older people often experience decreased creatinine clearance, changes in motility, atrophic gastritis, and changes in drug metabolism in the liver.11) These changes have important practical implications for the clinical management of older patients. Morphological and physiological changes in these degenerative processes in geriatrics also alter drug responses,12) which are influenced by interactions between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses.12)
Geriatric characteristics, such as aging, affect perioperative outcomes and the quality of postoperative recovery, which, in turn, affect the QOL in patients.9) QOL in geriatric patients is associated with their perception of their life situation, including life goals, norms, and interests. QOL also represents the life expectancy of older adults. In older adults, QOL should also be considered to achieve dynamic aging.13) Moreover, QOL is important for analyzing postoperative outcomes. Generally, postoperative outcomes of geriatric patients differ from those of patients in other age groups. More than 10% of geriatric patients aged ≥80 years have a postoperative disability.14) Therefore, patient postoperative function must be assessed, including QOL.15)
To achieve positive postoperative outcomes in geriatric patients, clinicians should consider preoperative factors. For example, the anesthesia technique requires full consideration due to the increased risk of negative drug responses in geriatric patients.16) Ideally, the medical profiles of patients, as well as physical, cognitive, psychological, logistical, financial, and social factors are assessed preoperatively. Intraoperative decision-making is more difficult because of decreased cognitive function.17) The choice of anesthesia in geriatrics is influenced by factors including the medical condition of the patient, surgery type and duration, and anesthesiologist and surgeon skills. However, evidence regarding the appropriate anesthesia for geriatric patients is insufficient. General anesthesia techniques potentially depress cardiovascular and respiratory functions as well as consciousness. Regional anesthesia has several advantages over general anesthesia, such as reducing the need for sedatives and analgesics, maintaining spontaneous ventilation, and reducing postoperative complications.16,18) A recent study suggested that regional anesthesia is more beneficial than general anesthesia as the primary anesthetic modality. However, this finding remains controversial due to the quality of the study and lack of consideration of the risk of neuraxial block.19,20)
To date, no study has assessed the outcomes of changes in cognitive function and QOL in geriatric patients after elective surgery in Indonesia or other regions. Therefore, this study investigated the relationships between patient characteristics, anesthetic management, and changes in postoperative cognitive function and QOL in geriatric patients undergoing elective surgery at an Indonesian hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population

This prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in Indonesia by the Indonesian College of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy (KATI) between February and April 2021 and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Dr. Saiful Anwar General Hospital (No. 400/025/K.3/302/201).
The study population comprised geriatric patients undergoing elective surgery under regional or general anesthesia during the study period. The study participants were recruited from 14 national educational hospitals in Indonesia. We used the multiple regression analysis sample formula to perform minimum sampling with a study power of 95%, as follows:
n=Zα2+Zβd2+k+1,
where Zα2 is the critical value for a significance level of 0.05 (1.96), is the critical value for a power of 95% (1.645), d is the expected effect size, and k is the number of predictor variables.
According to the minimum sample formula, this study required 95 participants to be enrolled. Assuming a 10% dropout rate, a minimum of 106 patients was required. Consecutive samples were collected during the study period.
We recruited participants who met the inclusion criteria, including geriatric patients aged ≥60 years undergoing elective surgery and requiring anesthesia in the operating room. The inclusion of participants >60 years was based on the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of older adults as being within 60–80 years of age and 60 years as the commonly used benchmark for old age. We excluded patients and their families who refused to participate, those who did not undergo follow-up 30 days after surgery, and those with missing data.

Variable Measurement

The study variables were geriatric preoperative characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, anesthetic management, preoperative cognitive function, and QOL. The BMI measurement was then categorized as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normoweight (18.5 - <25 kg/m2), overweight (25 - <30 kg/m2), obese I (30 - <35 kg/m2), and obese II (35 - <40 kg/m2). The recorded cognitive functions included orientation to time, place, attention, recall, language, repetition, and the ability to follow complex instructions. We assessed cognitive impairment using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), in which normal cognition, and mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment were defined as scores of 27–30, 21–26, 11–20, and 0–10, respectively. We assessed QOL using the WHOQOL tool by measuring four aspects: physical, psychological, social, and environmental.
We recorded participant characteristics preoperatively. Data on the anesthetic characteristics were recorded when the patient underwent surgery. We assessed cognitive function and QOL 1 day preoperatively and 30 days postoperatively. The MMSE and QOL scores were assessed by study personnel. Multicenter data were collected using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Patient characteristics were presented on numerical and categorical scales. Data were presented as frequencies and percentages. This study used one-tailed statistical analysis. We analyzed the difference between two categories using bivariate chi-square tests and the influence of geriatric factors on cognitive function and QOL using a multivariate logistic regression test. Before analyzing the bivariate chi-square tests, we performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve test analysis to determine the cut-off QOL value based on the WHOQOL tool. All analyses used α=5% with p<0.05. The statistical analyses and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 18.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

This study included a total of 933 geriatric patients. Their characteristics are presented in Table 1. Approximately 49.1% of the participants were aged 60–65 years and most were females (55.0%). Approximately 65.3% of the patients had comorbidities, most commonly hypertension (n=394; 39.7%), followed by diabetes (n=131; 13.2%) and tumors (n=127; 12.8%). Most patients were classified as obese (23.3%) or overweight (23.0%) and had an ASA physical status of II (n=643; 64.8%). A total of 594 (59.8%) and 399 (41.2%) patients, respectively, received general and regional anesthesia.
Bivariate analysis of the characteristics and cognitive function of the geriatric patients showed that age (p=0.000), BMI (p=0.012), comorbidities (cerebrovascular disease [p=0.035], dementia [p=0.026], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD; p=0.023], and hemiplegia [p=0.047]), and ASA physical status (p=0.002) differed significantly between patients with impaired and normal cognitive function. More than half of the geriatric patients (54.1%) with normal cognitive function were aged 60–65 years, 37.2% were aged 66–74 years, and 8.7% were aged 77–90 years (p<0.05). Among patients with impaired cognitive function, 18.2% were 77–90 years of age (old), 37.5% were 66–74 years of age (young-old), and 44.3% were 60–65 years of age (older). Among these patients, 44.9%, 24.2%, and 18.6% were classified as having normal weight, overweight, and obesity I, respectively. Among patients with normal cognitive function, 38.4% had normal weight, 21.7% were overweight, and 28.0% were categorized as obese (obesity I). We observed comorbidities such as cerebrovascular disease, dementia, COPD, and hemiplegia significantly more often in patients with cognitive impairment than in those with normal cognition . In addition, most patients in both the impaired (59.7%) and normal (69.9%) cognitive function groups had ASA physical status II (Table 2).
Before performing the bivariate chi-square tests, we performed ROC curve analysis to determine the cutoff value for QOL based on the WHOQOL tool. The cutoff value was 65.4 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.591; 95% CI, 0.566–0.616). Meanwhile, the cutoff for changes in QOL (ΔWHOQOL) was 2.94 (AUC=0.757; 95% CI, 0.728–0.787). The results of the ROC analysis showed that WHOQOL changes <2.95 were unfavorable, whereas changes >2.95 were considered good (Fig. 1).
The results of the bivariate chi-square test of geriatric patient characteristics and changes in QOL showed that age (p=0.035), BMI (p=0.000), and cognitive function (p=0.004) were significantly associated with changes in patient QOL. We defined ΔWHOQOL as the difference between pre- and postoperative QOL. Based on the cutoff value, 619 patients (66.3%) experienced unfavorable changes in their QOL and 374 (33.7%) experienced improved QOL. Approximately 46.4% of patients with a low QOL were aged 55–65 years, 40.4% were aged 66–74 years, and 13.2% were aged 75–90 years. Among patients with a good QOL, 53% were classified as older, 32% as young-old, and 13.9% as old. Among patients with low QOL, most were of normal weight (43.9%), whereas 23.6% and 18.6% were overweight and obese, respectively. Among these patients, 38.0% were normoweight, 31% were obese I, and 21.9% were overweight. Approximately 63.3% of geriatric patients who experienced unfavorable changes in QOL experienced impaired cognitive function, compared with 54.0% of those who experienced positive changes in QOL (Table 3).
Based on the preoperative MMSE scores, 49.5% of patients had normal cognitive function, 42.5% had mild cognitive impairment, and 7.8% had moderate cognitive impairment. 50.5% of geriatric patients had impaired cognitive function. Postoperative assessment showed that 49.4% of patients had impaired cognitive function, and 50.6% had normal cognitive function (Fig. 2). Preoperative assessment of patient QOL showed that 44.0% of geriatric patients were classified as having good QOL. Postoperatively, patients with good QOL increased to 56.0% (Fig. 3).
A multivariate logistic regression test was performed to determine the effect of patient characteristics (age, sex, BMI, presence or absence of comorbidities, ASA physical status, and general and regional anesthesia management) on the cognitive function of geriatric patients. The Nagelkerke R2 coefficient was 0.052 (5.2%), indicating that 5.2% of the variation in cognitive function was influenced by patient characteristics. The regression analysis identified age, BMI, and ASA physical status as factors affecting cognitive function in geriatric patients. Regarding age, older patients had a 0.688-fold higher probability of cognitive dysfunction, compared with younger patients (odds ratio [OR]=0.688; 95% CI, 1.005–1.288). Patients with a higher BMI had a 1.138-fold higher probability of experiencing cognitive changes, compared with patients with a lower BMI (OR=1.138; 95% CI, 1.005–1.288). Finally, a higher ASA physical status indicated a 0.633-fold higher probability of experiencing cognitive changes, compared with a lower ASA physical status (95% CI, 0.483–0.828) (Table 4).
BMI, presence or absence of comorbidities, regional anesthesia, and cognitive function affected the postoperative QOL in geriatric patients in the present study. The Nagelkerke R2 coefficient value was 0.062, indicating that the characteristics of geriatric patients influenced 6.2% of the variation in the postoperative QOL. Patients with a higher BMI had a 1.244-fold higher risk of changed QOL, compared with patients with a lower BMI (95% CI, 1.094–1.413). The presence of comorbidities decreased the QOL of geriatric patients by 0.734-fold, compared with the QOL of patients without comorbidities (95% CI, 0.543–0.987). Patients with normal cognitive function had a 1.334-fold higher probability of a better QOL change, compared with patients with impaired cognitive function (95% CI, 1.020–1.743). Regional anesthesia had a regression coefficient of 0.606 and an OR of 1.833. Patients who received regional anesthesia were 1.833-fold more likely to experience a good QOL than those who did not receive regional anesthesia (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

Cognitive impairment and reduced QOL in geriatric patients may increase disability and mortality.21) This study investigated the relationship between patient characteristics and anesthetic management and changes in cognitive function and QOL in geriatric patients undergoing elective surgery. The geriatric characteristics included age, sex, BMI, ASA physical status, and type of anesthesia used. In this study, most of the geriatric patients were aged between 60–65 years, were female, and had comorbidities. The BMI of geriatric patients was most often classified as normal. The most common ASA physical status was ASA II, and general anesthesia was more commonly used. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity. The demographic data in this study were consistent with those of a national multicenter study, which reported a mean age of the geriatric patients as 67.1±6.2 years, mostly ideal BMI, and ASA II classification.22) ASA II represents a patient with a mild-to-moderate medical condition that may not be completely controlled but does not severely limit their daily activities.23)
To determine the effect of patient characteristics (age, sex, BMI, ASA physical status, and type of anesthesia used) on the cognitive function and QOL of geriatric patients, a multivariate logistic regression test was performed. This study demonstrated that 5.2% of the variations in cognitive function were influenced by patient characteristics. Based on the regression test, age, BMI, and ASA physical status were found to affect cognitive function in geriatric patients. Older patients had higher odds of cognitive dysfunction compared with younger patients. This study is in line with previous studies. A previous study of 578 healthy older people, whose ages varied between 64 and 81 years, found that age is related to cognitive function.24-26) Therefore, this study provides evidence that preoperative age in geriatrics is correlated with postoperative cognitive function.
A higher BMI was also associated with greater odds of having greater postoperative cognitive function, compared with a lower BMI. However, the relationship between BMI and cognitive function in older adults remains controversial. Several studies have reported conflicting results regarding the correlation between BMI and cognitive function. A lower BMI in older people is associated with cognitive impairment and dementia.27) A higher BMI in older people is associated with poorer cognitive outcomes and an increased risk of dementia.28) Underweight older people have a high risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, whereas being overweight is associated with a 21% and 25% reduction in risk.27) However, another study reported that a higher BMI in older people is associated with poorer cognitive outcomes and an increased risk of dementia.28) The results of previous studies can partly be explained by the presence of confounding factors. Some studies controlled for sociodemographic factors (e.g., sex and education) and psychosocial and mental health factors (e.g., anxiety and depression), whereas others controlled for physical comorbidities associated with being overweight and obese (e.g., diabetes and cardiovascular disease).
A higher ASA physical status is associated with increased odds of experiencing a decline in postoperative cognitive function, compared with a lower ASA physical status. Gan et al.29) reported higher ASA physical status in a cognitively impaired group versus a cognitively normal group. Several moderate-to-severe diseases, such as diabetes or uncontrolled hypertension, a history of transient ischemic attack, or coronary artery disease in patients with higher ASA physical status are associated with functional limitations. In the present study, the significant relationship between age, BMI, ASA classification, and changes in cognitive function could be of particular concern regarding factors influencing postoperative cognitive impairment in geriatric patients.
Our investigation of patient QOL revealed that 6.2% of the variation in the postoperative QOL was influenced by the characteristics of the geriatric patients. BMI, presence or absence of comorbidities, regional anesthesia, and cognitive function affect the QOL of geriatric patients. Patients with a higher BMI had higher odds of having a lower QOL, compared with patients with a lower BMI. Compared with those with normal weight (18.5 < BMI < 25 kg/m2), individuals who were overweight or obese had a lower QOL. Some of the long-term effects of being overweight that can affect QOL include diabetes, heart disease, stroke, cancer, osteoarthritis, breathing problems, and high blood pressure. Moreover, diabetes, heart disease, osteoarthritis, and high blood pressure may mediate the association between being overweight and the QOL.30)
The presence of comorbidities has greater odds of decreasing the QOL of geriatric patients, compared with a lack of comorbidities. The chronic impact of comorbidities is associated with a loss in health-related QOL.31) We also observed that regional anesthesia had greater odds of providing a good QOL, compared with general anesthesia. These results complement those of previous studies and underscore the positive outcomes in improving postoperative QOL with a lower risk of failed intubation and providing effective pain control, mobility, and daily activities, which can improve QOL.32)
Normal cognitive function is also associated with changes in the postoperative QOL. Patients with normal cognitive function tended to have a better QOL than did those with impaired cognitive function. In older people, changes in cognitive function tend to be significantly associated with increased depression and decreased QOL.6) Aging causes changes in the brain, leading to decreased cognitive reserve, susceptibility to the stress of surgery and anesthesia, and an increased risk of neurological injury, such as postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). POCD is associated with a decreased QOL, loss of function, and increased mortality.33)
Based on the overall geriatric characteristics in the present study, BMI was correlated with postoperative cognitive function and QOL. We observed a significant positive correlation between BMI and postoperative cognitive function in geriatric patients. Specifically, the results of the regression analysis indicated that a higher BMI was associated with better postoperative cognitive function, as evidenced by a positive regression coefficient (B=0.129) and OR (1.138). For each unit increase in BMI, the odds of better postoperative cognitive outcomes increased by approximately 13.8%. A higher BMI may indicate better nutritional status and metabolic reserves, which can be crucial for recovery and cognitive function after surgery.34) Adequate nutrition can support brain function and resilience to surgical stress. Although a higher BMI is often associated with obesity-related health issues, in the context of geriatric patients, a moderately higher BMI might reflect better overall health, compared with underweight or malnourished conditions, which can adversely affect cognitive function.35)
Conversely, our study results revealed an inverse relationship between BMI and postoperative QOL. The regression coefficient was negative (B=-0.218), and the OR (1.244) suggested that a higher BMI was associated with decreased postoperative QOL, with the odds of experiencing a decline in QOL increasing by approximately 24.4% for each unit increase in BMI. Higher BMI can lead to decreased postoperative mobility and physical function. Obesity is often linked to comorbid conditions, such as osteoarthritis, which can exacerbate postsurgical recovery challenges and reduce QOL.36) Obesity can also increase the risk of surgical complications, including infections, delayed wound healing, and cardiovascular events, all of which can negatively impact postoperative recovery and QOL. Our finding that BMI significantly influenced postoperative cognitive function and QOL is crucial, especially considering the projected growth of the geriatric population. As the global population ages, the number of individuals aged ≥60 years is expected to rise significantly, underscoring the need for improved geriatric management strategies to support the unique needs of older adults. Further research is essential to validate and expand upon these findings, identify the mechanisms by which BMI influences cognitive function and QOL, and evaluate perioperative strategies, such as nutritional support, physical rehabilitation, and tailored anesthesia plans.
The early identification of patients at risk of poor postoperative cognitive function and decreased QOL can lead to more effective perioperative planning through comprehensive preoperative assessments and multidisciplinary care plans. Educating patients and their families about the potential risks and the importance of optimizing health before surgery is also crucial. Integrating these findings into clinical practice will allow clinicians to provide the most beneficial treatment for geriatric patients, potentially choosing between general and regional anesthesia based on BMI and overall health status and offering preoperative and postoperative nutritional support and physical rehabilitation.
The short duration of this study, influenced by the coronavirus disease pandemic, highlights the need for longer follow-up periods in future studies to provide comprehensive data on long-term outcomes. Extended studies involving larger and more diverse populations and considering the potential disruptions caused by public health emergencies are necessary. Despite the limitations of this study, its insights are pivotal for enhancing the management of geriatric patients undergoing surgery and aiding further research to ultimately improve postoperative outcomes and QOL in geriatric patients. One limitation of this study was that we did not record the type of surgery, which could affect the postoperative condition. Instead, we considered the physical status based on the ASA classification to describe the severity of the preoperative conditions. Future studies should include the type of surgery as a variable to better understand its impact on postoperative outcomes.
In conclusion, We observed an association between geriatric characteristics, including age, BMI, ASA physical status, and postoperative cognitive function in geriatric patients. In addition, BMI, presence or absence of comorbidities, regional anesthesia, and cognitive function also affected the postoperative QOL of these patients. These preoperative factors can be used to predict postoperative cognitive function and QOL to achieve adequate postoperative management.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The researchers claim no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

This study receive no funding from any organization.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization, II, AAA, TAS; Data curation, NH, TAS, NMR, SC, DS, MIL, TGAS; Funding acquisition, II, AAA, NH, TAS, NMR, SC, DS, MIL, TGAS, HN, BW, BP, APP, NA, KMS, RAH, ZKJ, AHN, MM, PP; Investigation, NH, TGAS, BW, APP, ZKJ, AHN; Methodology, NMR, MIL, MM, PP; Project administration, BP, PP; Supervision, NM, AHN;

Writing-original draft, II, AAA, NH, TAS, NMR, SC, DS, MIL, TGAS; Writing-review & editing, HN, BW, BP, APP, NA, KMS, RAH, ZKJ, AHN, MM, PP.

Fig. 1.
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the cutoff value of (A) quality of life and (B) changes in quality of life (based on the World Health Organization Quality of Life tool).
agmr-24-0102f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Distributions of patient cognitive function pre- and postoperatively.
agmr-24-0102f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Distributions of patient quality of life pre- and postoperatively.
agmr-24-0102f3.jpg
Table 1.
Characteristics of the geriatric patients included in the present study (n=933)
Characteristic n (%)
Age (y)
 60–65 488 (49.1)
 66–74 371 (37.4)
 75–90 134 (13.5)
Sex
 Male 447 (45.0)
 Female 546 (55.0)
Comorbid status
 Present 648 (65.3)
 Not present 345 (34.7)
BMI
 Underweight 74 (7.5)
 Normoweight 414 (41.7)
 Overweight 228 (23.0)
 Obese I 231 (23.3)
 Obese II 46 (4.6)
ASA physical status
 ASA I 15 (1.5)
 ASA II 643 (64.8)
 ASA III 331 (33.3)
 ASA IV 4 (0.4)
Anesthesia management
 General 594 (59.8)
 Regional 399 (40.2)
Comorbidity
 Hypertension 394 (39.7)
 Diabetes 131 (13.2)
 Tumor 127 (12.8)
 Congestive heart failure 60 (6.0)
 Kidney illness (moderate-severe) 54 (5.4)
 Myocardial infarction 34 (3.4)
 Peripheral vascular disease 23 (2.3)
 Chronic pulmonary disease 23 (2.3)
 Cerebrovascular disease 22 (2.2)
 Diabetes with organ failure 13 (1.3)
 Metastasis tumor 11 (1.1)
 Dementia 5 (0.5)
 Hyperlexia 4 (0.4)
 Liver injury (mild) 4 (0.4)
 Peptic ulcer disease 4 (0.4)
 Rheumatologic disease 3 (0.3)
 Liver injury (severe) 2 (0.2)

BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Table 2.
Bivariate chi-squared test results for the comparisons of patient characteristics and cognitive function
Cognitive function
p-value
Impaireda) (n=501) Normal (n=492)
Ageb) (y)
 60–65 222 (44.3) 266 (54.1) <0.001*
 66–74 188 (37.5) 183 (37.2)
 75–90 91 (18.2) 43 (8.7)
Sex
 Male 236 (47.1) 211 (42.9) 0.181
 Female 265 (52.9) 281 (57.1)
Comorbid status
 Present 328 (65.5) 320 (65.0) 0.887
 Not present 173 (34.5) 172 (35.0)
BMI
 Underweight 39 (7.8) 35 (7.1) <0.05*
 Normoweight 225 (44.9) 189 (38.4)
 Overweight 121 (24.2) 107 (21.7)
 Obese I 93 (18.6) 138 (28.0)
 Obese II 23 (4.6) 23 (4.7)
Comorbidity
 Myocardial infarction 15 (3.0) 19 (3.9) 0.452
 Congestive heart disease 33 (6.6) 27 (5.5) 0.467
 Peripheral vascular disease 11 (2.2) 14 (2.8) 0.799
 Cerebrovascular disease 16 (3.2) 6 (1.2) <0.05*
 Dementia 5 (1.0) 0 (0) <0.05*
 Chronic pulmonary disease 17 (3.4) 6 (1.2) <0.05*
 Rheumatologic disease 1 (0.2) 2 (0.4) 0.553
 Peptic ulcer disease 2 (0.4) 2 (0.4) >0.99
 Liver injury (mild) 2 (0.4) 2 (0.4) 0.986
 Liver injury (moderate-severe) 1 (0.2) 1 (0.2) 0.990
 Diabetes 64 (12.8) 67 (13.6) 0.695
 Hemiplegia 4 (0.8) 0 (0) <0.05*
 Kidney illness (moderate-severe) 24 (4.8) 30 (6.1) 0.364
 Diabetes with organ failure 8 (1.6) 5 (1.0) 0.421
 Tumor 54 (10.8) 73 (14.8) 0.056
 Metastasis tumor 8 (1.6) 3 (0.6) 0.137
 Hypertension 193 (38.5) 201 (40.9) 0.453
ASA physical status
 ASA I 7 (1.4) 8 (1.6) <0.05*
 ASA II 299 (59.7) 344 (69.9)
 ASA III 191 (38.1) 140 (28.5)
 ASA IV 4 (0.8) 0 (0)

Values are presented as number (%).

BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists.

a)Impaired cognitive function: mild cognitive impairment, moderate cognitive impairment, severe cognitive impairment.

b)Geriatric age classification based on the World Health Organization 2013.

*Significantly different with p<0.05.

Table 3.
Results of bivariate chi-square test comparing patient characteristics and change in the quality of life (based on the World Health Organization quality of life tool)
Change in the Quality of Life (based on ROC)
p-value
Low (<2.95) Good (>2.95)
Number of patients 619 374
Age (y)
 60–65 287 (46.4) 201 (53.7) <0.05*
 66–74 250 (40.4) 121 (32.4)
 75–90 82 (13.2) 52 (13.9)
Sex
 Male 285 (46.0) 162 (43.3) 0.403
 Female 334 (54.0) 212 (56.7)
Comorbidity
 Present 390 (63.0) 258 (69.0) 0.055
 Not present 229 (37.0) 116 (31.0)
BMI
 Underweight 56 (9.0) 18 (4.8) <0.05*
 Normoweight 272 (43.9) 142 (38.0)
 Overweight 146 (23.6) 82 (21.9)
 Obese I 115 (18.6) 116 (31.0)
 Obese II 30 (4.8) 16 (4.3)
ASA physical status
 ASA I 10 (1.6) 5 (1.3) 0.412
 ASA II 397 (64.1) 246 (65.8)
 ASA III 211 (34.1) 120 (32.1)
 ASA IV 1 (0.2) 3 (0.8)
Anesthesia management
 General anesthesia 253 (40.9) 341 (91.2) 0.273
 Regional 184 (29.7) 215 (57.5)
 Fungsi kognitif normal 301 (48.6) 231 (61.8)
Cognitive function
 Impaired 392 (63.3) 202 (54.0) <0.05*
 Normal 227 (36.7) 172 (46.0)

Values are presented as number (%).

BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

*Significantly different with p<0.05.

Table 4.
Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis between geriatric patient characteristics and cognitive function
B Sig. Exp(B) 95% CI for Exp(B)
Lower Upper
Age -0.374 0.000* 0.688 0.571 0.828
Sex 0.204 0.119 1.226 0.949 1.584
BMI 0.129 0.041* 1.138 1.005 1.288
Comorbid -0.179 0.219 0.836 0.628 1.113
ASA physical status -0.458 0.001* 0.633 0.483 0.828
General anesthesia 0.380 0.147 1.462 0.875 2.442
Regional anesthesia -0.227 0.378 0.797 0.482 1.319

BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; CI, confidence interval.

*Significantly different with p<0.05.

Table 5.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of geriatric patient characteristics and quality of life
B Sig. Exp(B) 95% CI for Exp(B)
Lower Upper
Age -0.100 0.311 0.905 0.746 1.098
Sex 0.117 0.387 1.124 0.862 1.466
BMI -0.218 0.001* 1.244 1.094 1.413
Comorbid -0.312 0.041* 0.732 0.543 0.987
ASA physical status -0.093 0.517 0.912 0.689 1.206
General anesthesia -0.055 0.853 0.946 0.527 1.698
Regional anesthesia 0.606 0.042* 1.833 1.021 3.290

BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; CI, confidence interval.

*Significantly different with p<0.05.

REFERENCES

1. United Nations. World population ageing 2015. New York, NY: United Nations; 2015.

2. Adioetomo SM, Mujahid G. Indonesia on the threshold of population ageing. Jakarta, Indonesia: United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA); 2014.

3. The National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction. The situation of the elderly in Indonesia and access to social protection programs: secondary data analysis. Jakarta, Indonesia: The National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction; 2020.

4. Miller R. Biology of aging and longevity. In: Halter B, Ouslander J, Tiinneti M, Studenski S, Higj K, Asthana K, editors. Hazzard’s geriatric medicines and gerontology. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2009. p. 3-14.

5. Warner H, Sierra F, Thomson L. Biology of aging. In: Fillit HM, Rockwood K, Woodhouse K, editors. Brocklehurst’s textbook of geriatric medicine and gerontology. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2010. p. 30-7.

6. Antony JM, Weaver I, Rueffer M, Guthrie N, Evans M. The essentials of a global index for cognitive function. Transl Neurosci 2017;8:87-96.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Zhao Q, Wan H, Pan H, Xu Y. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction-current research progress. Front Behav Neurosci 2024;18:1328790.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Kazazi L, Foroughan M, Nejati V, Shati M. Association between age associated cognitive decline and health related quality of life among Iranian older individuals. Electron Physician 2018;10:6663-71.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Lim BG, Lee IO. Anesthetic management of geriatric patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2020;73:8-29.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Ferrucci L, Cooper R, Shardell M, Simonsick EM, Schrack JA, Kuh D. Age-related change in mobility: perspectives from life course epidemiology and geroscience. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2016;71:1184-94.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Alvis BD, Hughes CG. Physiology considerations in geriatric patients. Anesthesiol Clin 2015;33:447-56.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Mangoni AA, Jackson SH. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: basic principles and practical applications. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2004;57:6-14.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Jazayeri E, Kazemipour S, Hosseini SR, Radfar M. Quality of life in the elderly: a community study. Caspian J Intern Med 2023;14:534-42.
pmid pmc
14. Amemiya T, Oda K, Ando M, Kawamura T, Kitagawa Y, Okawa Y, et al. Activities of daily living and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gastric and colorectal cancers. Ann Surg 2007;246:222-8.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Nightingale G, Battisti NM, Loh KP, Puts M, Kenis C, Goldberg A, et al. Perspectives on functional status in older adults with cancer: an interprofessional report from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) nursing and allied health interest group and young SIOG. J Geriatr Oncol 2021;12:658-65.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Amornyotin S. Anesthetic consideration for geriatric patients. Update in geriatrics. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. p. 71-84. https://doi.org/10.5772.intechopen.97003.

17. Steffens NM, Tucholka JL, Nabozny MJ, Schmick AE, Brasel KJ, Schwarze ML. Engaging patients, health care professionals, and community members to improve preoperative decision making for older adults facing high-risk surgery. JAMA Surg 2016;151:938-45.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Urwin SC, Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:450-5.
crossref pmid
19. Guay J, Choi PT, Suresh S, Albert N, Kopp S, Pace NL. Neuraxial anesthesia for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of cochrane systematic reviews. Anesth Analg 2014;119:716-25.
crossref pmid
20. Nordquist D, Halaszynski TM. Perioperative multimodal anesthesia using regional techniques in the aging surgical patient. Pain Res Treat 2014;2014:902174.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
21. Ren L, Zheng Y, Wu L, Gu Y, He Y, Jiang B, et al. Investigation of the prevalence of cognitive impairment and its risk factors within the elderly population in Shanghai, China. Sci Rep 2018;8:3575.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
22. Rehatta NM, Susilo C, Sari D, Lestari MI, Senapathi TG, Nurdin H, et al. Impact of comorbidities and COVID-19 on the survival rate of geriatric patients receiving anesthesia services: a prospective cohort study in Indonesia. BMC Geriatr 2022;22:523.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Daabiss M. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth 2011;55:111-5.
crossref pmid pmc
24. van Hooren SA, Valentijn AM, Bosma H, Ponds RW, van Boxtel MP, Jolles J. Cognitive functioning in healthy older adults aged 64-81: a cohort study into the effects of age, sex, and education. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2007;14:40-54.
crossref pmid
25. Scanlan JM, Binkin N, Michieletto F, Lessig M, Zuhr E, Borson S. Cognitive impairment, chronic disease burden, and functional disability: a population study of older Italians. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;15:716-24.
crossref pmid
26. Rait G, Fletcher A, Smeeth L, Brayne C, Stirling S, Nunes M, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment: results from the MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community. Age Ageing 2005;34:242-8.
crossref pmid
27. Qu Y, Hu HY, Ou YN, Shen XN, Xu W, Wang ZT, et al. Association of body mass index with risk of cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020;115:189-19.
crossref pmid
28. Benito-León J, Mitchell AJ, Hernández-Gallego J, Bermejo-Pareja F. Obesity and impaired cognitive functioning in the elderly: a population-based cross-sectional study (NEDICES). Eur J Neurol 2013;20(6):899-906.
crossref pmid
29. Gan S, Yu Y, Wu J, Tang X, Zheng Y, Wang M, et al. Preoperative assessment of cognitive function and risk assessment of cognitive impairment in elderly patients with orthopedics: a cross-sectional study. BMC Anesthesiol 2020;20:189.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
30. Kearns B, Ara R, Young T, Relton C. Association between body mass index and health-related quality of life, and the impact of self-reported long-term conditions - cross-sectional study from the south Yorkshire cohort dataset. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1009.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
31. Rothrock NE, Hays RD, Spritzer K, Yount SE, Riley W, Cella D. Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1195-204.
crossref pmid pmc
32. Ghaffari S, Dehghanpisheh L, Tavakkoli F, Mahmoudi H. The effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on quality of life in women undergoing cesarean delivery on maternal request. Cureus 2018;10:e3715.
crossref pmid pmc
33. Vacas S, Cole DJ, Cannesson M. Cognitive decline associated with anesthesia and surgery in older patients. JAMA 2021;326:863-4.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Lo Menzo E, Cappellani A, Zanghi A, Di Vita M, Berretta M, Szomstein S. Nutritional implications of obesity: before and after bariatric surgery. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care 2014;9:9-17.
crossref pmid pmc
35. Golubnitschaja O, Liskova A, Koklesova L, Samec M, Biringer K, Busselberg D, et al. Caution, "normal" BMI: health risks associated with potentially masked individual underweight-EPMA position paper 2021. EPMA J 2021;12:243-64.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
36. Cannata F, Laudisio A, Ambrosio L, Vadala G, Russo F, Zampogna B, et al. The Association of body mass index with surgical time is mediated by comorbidity in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2021;10:5600.
crossref pmid pmc
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
  • 846 View
  • 65 Download
Related articles in
Ann Geriatr Med Res


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article Category

Browse all articles >

TOPICS

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#401 Yuksam Hyundai Venturetel, 20, Teheran-ro 25-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06132, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2269-1039    Fax: +82-2-2269-1040    E-mail: agmr.editorial@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Geriatrics Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next