Ann Geriatr Med Res Search

CLOSE


Ann Geriatr Med Res > Volume 28(3); 2024 > Article
Oliva-Zapata, Ururi-Cupi, Salazar-Talla, Alcantara-Diaz, Cuba-Ruiz, Urrunaga-Pastor, Runzer-Colmenares, and Parodi: Association between Gait Speed and Balance Disorders in Older Adults from 12 High Andean Peruvian Communities, 2013–2019

Abstract

Background

Gait speed is associated with a higher prevalence of balance disorders in older adults residing at high altitudes. This study investigated this association in older adults from 12 high-altitude Andean Peruvian communities.

Methods

We performed a secondary data analysis from an analytical cross-sectional study of adults >60 years of age, residing in 12 high-altitude Andean Peruvian communities, enrolled between 2013 and 2019. The exposure and outcome variables were gait speed (categorized in tertiles), and balance disorders (defined as a functional reach value of ≤20.32 cm), respectively. We built generalized linear models of the Poisson family with a logarithmic link function and robust variances, and estimated crude prevalence ratios (cPR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

We analyzed 418 older adults; 38.8% (n=162) were male, and the mean age was 73.2±6.9 years. The mean gait speed and functional reach were 0.66±0.24 m/s and 19.9±6.48 cm, respectively. In the adjusted regression model, the intermediate (aPR=1.88; 95% CI, 1.39–2.55; p<0.001) and low (aPR=2.04; 95% CI, 1.51–2.76; p<0.001) tertiles of gait speed were associated with a higher prevalence of balance disorders.

Conclusion

The intermediate and low tertiles of gait speed were associated with a higher prevalence of balance disorders among older adult residents of 12 high-altitude Andean communities. We recommend further research on the behavior of this association to propose interventions for these vulnerable groups and reduce the impact of geriatric conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Aging causes numerous physiological changes and increases the risk of chronic diseases. Additionally, it is associated with a general decline in mobility, which directly influences an older adult’s ability to walk by altering their gait.1,2) Gait speed is a vital sign in older adults. Alterations in gait speed can predict a variety of adverse outcomes, including functional dependence, frailty, cognitive impairment, falls, isolation, hospitalization, cardiovascular events, and mortality.3) In addition, functional degradation, which is typical of aging, can cause physical manifestations such as postural instability, muscle weakness, and increased sensory deficits,4,5) which can also cause alterations in the gait speed of older adults.
Gait execution requires the coordination of extremity movement, postural tone, and balance.6) Balance can be affected when sensory input from the eyes (presbyopia),7) feet, or ankles8) is impaired. Balance disorders have been reported in adults residing in high-altitude areas with hypobaric hypoxia.9) Hypoxia can influence the partial pressure of inspired, arterial, and alveolar oxygen in the integration between the central nervous system and sensorimotor function,9) leading to deterioration of neuromuscular coordination and changes in standing balance.10) This has resulted in a higher prevalence of balance disorders ranging from 3.3%–21.5% (which increases with age) in older adults residing in high-altitude areas compared with those residing at sea level.11) In addition, permanent exposure to hypoxia causes a reduction in muscle mass,12) which can lead to other geriatric syndromes,13) sequencing balance disorders, and fatal outcomes such as mortality in older residents of high-altitude areas.
A previous systematic review evaluated the presence of balance disorders in a high-altitude population9); however, no study has reported on people from the Andes. Moreover, the previous study populations were mainly young adults. Likewise, although gait speed is an important predictor and an effective and easy-to-apply measure for evaluating balance disorders, no study has evaluated this association in older adults at high altitudes or in the Andes, where older adults could have higher exposure to the chronic effects of altitude. Therefore, the present study investigated the association between gait speed and balance disorders in older adults from 12 high-altitude Andean communities in Peru between 2013 and 2019.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design, Population, and Sample

Study design

This observational, cross-sectional, and analytical study used data from an open-access secondary database. The primary study paved the way for new research focused on geriatric syndromes present in the high-altitude Andean Peruvian population.

Population and sample

The primary study included 453 adults aged ≥60 years living in 12 high-altitude Andean communities (>1,500 m above sea level [MASL]) in the Peruvian highlands: Viñac (Lima), San Pedro de Chaná, Llupa, Macashca and Atipayán (Ancash), Ayahuanco (Ayacucho), Pampamarca (Huánuco), Chacapampa (Huancayo), Vilca (Huancavelica), Paucarcolla (Puno), and Leimebamba and La Jalca (Amazonas) evaluated between 2013 and 2019.
In the primary study, non-probabilistic census-type sampling was used in each urban/rural community, achieving an approximate inclusion of 95% of older adult inhabitants in most of these communities.

Procedures

Participants were approached at their homes with the help of a guide from the area, and individuals who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study signed the informed consent form. Information on sociodemographic data, medical history (falls, polypharmacy, comorbidities, consumption of tobacco and alcohol), anthropometric measurements (weight and height), physical performance test procedures (gait speed), functional assessment (the Barthel index and Edmonton questionnaire), and mental assessments, including depressive symptoms, were collected by medical students and physicians previously trained in data evaluation by a geriatrician. For participants who did not understand Spanish, their relatives were requested to translate the questions for data collection.

Variables

Outcome variable

Balance disorders: Balance was evaluated using the functional reach test performed on a flat surface. The older adults were instructed to lean forward without moving their feet or touching the wall and without losing balance. The maximum reach with the first attempt was recorded in centimeters, considering the best of two attempts. For the analysis, the numerical variable was divided according to a cutoff point of 20.32 cm, and then categorized into two strata to prepare a score according to the presence of balance disorders. We defined the presence and absence of balance disorders as values ≤20.32 cm and ≥20.32 cm, respectively.14,15)

Exposure variables

Gait speed: Gait speed was measured using a test included in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), which evaluates physical performance. Participants were instructed to initiate a marked 4-m walk, and the time spent at a normal daily pace was measured using the best of two attempts. Scoring was based on time: 4 points for <4.82 seconds, 3 points for 4.82–6.20 seconds, 2 points for 6.21–8.7 seconds, 1 point for >8.7 seconds, and 0 points for participants unable to complete the test. The numeric variable was divided into four categories to define gait speed. Tertiles were generated based on this numerical variable.16,17)

Other variables

Sociodemographic characteristics: The self-reported sociodemographic characteristics evaluated include sex (female or male), age (≤70 years, 71–80 years, or >80 years), marital status (single, married, or widowed/divorced), educational level (no education/incomplete primary, completed primary, or completed secondary), living alone (yes or no), working (yes or no), and altitude (MASL). The collected information was corroborated using the participants’ national identity documents.
Medical and personal history: The following self-reported variables were included: tobacco use (yes or no), alcohol use (yes or no), polypharmacy (defined as the regular use of ≥5 drugs under medical prescription), falls in the last year (none or at least one), and comorbidities (arterial hypertension [yes or no], type 2 diabetes mellitus [yes or no], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [yes or no], and lower back pain (yes or no]). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the following formula: weight in kg/height in meters squared.
Neuropsychiatric evaluation: To assess depressive symptoms, we used the five-item Spanish version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) put forth by Yesavage,18,19) with scores ≥2 indicating depressive symptoms.20)
To assess cognitive impairment, we used the 10-question Pfeiffer questionnaire, which categorized participants based on the number of their error responses as follows: no cognitive impairment (0–2 errors), mild cognitive impairment (3–4 errors), and moderate cognitive impairment (5–7 errors).21)
Functional evaluation and geriatric syndromes: We used the Barthel Index to assess the presence or absence of disabilities in older adults. The Barthel Index is a questionnaire that assesses 10 basic activities of daily living. Its scores range from 0 to 100, with scores <100 indicating the presence of disability.22) In addition, we used two questions from the Edmonton Questionnaire: (1) social support: When you need help, can you count on someone who is willing and able to meet your needs? (always or sometimes/never), and (2) urinary incontinence: Do you have a problem with losing control of urine when you do not want to? (yes or no).23)

Statistical Analysis

We analyzed the data using Stata/SE, version 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). We present the descriptive results of the numerical variables as means and standard deviations, as well as medians with their respective interquartile ranges, depending on the normality distribution of the variables. Similarly, we summarized the categorical variables using relative and absolute frequencies. We used Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact tests to compare categorical variables. In addition, we used the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test to compare differences in numerical variables between groups based on the presence or absence of balance disorders. We applied analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the differences in numerical variables between the groups of tertiles according to gait speed.
We constructed two generalized linear models (crude and adjusted) of the Poisson family with a logarithmic link function and robust variances to evaluate the association between gait speed tertiles and balance disorders in the older adult participants. We estimated the crude prevalence ratios (cPRs) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) using their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We developed an adjusted model based on an epidemiological criterion, incorporating variables whose associations with the exposure and outcome variables have been described in the literature and were not observed in the causal pathway. We conducted an additional analysis using a linear regression model to estimate crude and adjusted beta (β) coefficients to assess the association between gait speed tertiles and functional reach.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The Institutional Research Ethics Committee (IREC) of the Universidad Científica del Sur evaluated and approved our use of the secondary data (632-2020-PRE15). The primary study was approved by the IREC of the Naval Medical Center (Memorandum No. 49). Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the integrity of the older adults was not violated, data confidentiality was maintained. This study complied the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research.24)

RESULTS

Descriptive and Bivariate Analysis according to Gait Speed Tertiles

We analyzed 418 older adults residing in 12 high-altitude Andean communities in Peru. Of these, 256 (61.3%) were women, and the mean age was 73.2±6.9 years. The mean gait speed was 0.66±0.24 m/s and functional reach was 19.91±6.48. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population according to gait speed tertiles in geriatric adults.

Descriptive and Bivariate Analysis according to the Presence of Balance Disorders

The gait speed (p<0.001), marital status (p=0.008), altitude (p=0.014), tobacco use (p=0.002), alcohol use (p<0.001), polypharmacy (p=0.001), BMI (p=0.002), social support (p=0.018), cognitive impairment (p<0.001), disability (p=0.001), and falls in the last year (p<0.001) differed significantly based on the presence of balance disorders (Table 2).

Descriptive Analysis of Gait Speed and Balance Disorders

The mean gait speeds for the higher, intermediate, and lower tertiles were 0.95±0.18 m/s, 0.56±0.07 m/s, and 0.46±0.04 m/s, respectively. Furthermore, the mean functional reach measurements in the groups without and with balance disorders were 25.0±4.42 cm and 14.6±3.25 cm, respectively. The median gait speeds were 0.95 m/s, 0.53 m/s, and 0.47 m/s for the high, medium, and low tertiles, respectively. Additionally, the median functional reach measurements in the groups without and with balance disorders were 24 cm and 15 cm, respectively. Supplementary Table S1 presents the descriptive characteristics of the primary variables.
The mean gait speeds were 0.61 m/s for women and 0.70 m/s for men. Regarding age groups, the mean gait speed was 0.66 m/s for those <71 years, 0.64 m/s for individuals aged 71–80 years, and 0.61 m/s for those >80 years of age. The mean functional reach measurements for women and men were 19.51 cm and 20.74 cm, respectively. Additionally, the mean functional reach measurements according to age group were 20.35 cm, 19.82 cm, and 19.54 cm for participants <71 years, 71–80 years, and >80 years, respectively (Supplementary Table S2).

Crude and Adjusted Prevalence Ratios to Estimate the Association between Gait Speed Tertiles and Balance Disorders

The crude Poisson regression model showed that the intermediate (cPR=1.81; 95% CI, 1.32–2.47; p<0.001) and low tertiles (cPR=2.35; 95% CI, 1.78–3.14; p<0.001) of gait speed increased the probability of presenting with a balance disorder. In the adjusted model, the intermediate (aPR=1.88; 95% CI, 1.39–2.55; p<0.001) and low tertiles (aPR=2.04; 95% CI, 1.51–2.76; p<0.001) were adjusted for confounding variables such as sex, age, educational level, living alone, work, comorbidities, neurocognitive disorder, depressive symptomatology, and disability (Table 3).

Crude and Adjusted Betas Coefficients to Estimate the Association between Gait Speed Tertiles and Functional Reach

The crude linear regression model showed that the low gait speed tertile was significantly associated with decreased functional reach (β=–2.04; 95% CI, –3.54 to –0.54; p=0.008), compared with the high gait speed tertile. After adjusting for potential confounders, this association remained significant (adjusted β=–2.21; 95% CI, –3.70 to –0.72; p=0.004). Conversely, the intermediate tertile showed non-significant associations in both crude (β=–0.81; 95% CI, –0.68 to 2.31; p=0.286) and adjusted models (adjusted β=1.19; 95% CI, –0.28 to 2.66; p=0.112) (Supplementary Table S3).

DISCUSSION

We evaluated 418 older adults, 48.8% of whom had balance disorders. Our results showed that older adults from 12 high-altitude Andean communities with an intermediate or low gait speed had the greatest probability of also presenting with a balance disorder.
The prevalence rates of slow gait speed and balance disorders were 34.2% and 48.8%, respectively. In previous studies of older adults who did not reside at high altitudes, the prevalence rates of slow gait speed (10.2%–41%) and balance disorders (3.3%–21.5%) were similar and even lower than those observed in our study.11,25-30) However, most studies evaluated outcomes such as falls8,31) or mortality32,33) and did not investigate the possible association between slow gait speed and balance disorders.
Gait speed and balance disorders are associated with residential altitude in older adults. A systematic review found that hypobaric hypoxia, a characteristic of residents in high-altitude areas, could cause an up to 2.4-fold alteration in standing balance,9) which may explain the increased prevalence of balance disorders in the present study, unlike the prevalence rates reported in older adults who did not reside in high-altitude areas. Another study found that balance disorders may be reduced by improving the functional capacity in older adults.34) However, exposure to high altitude is associated with decreased exercise capacity,35) making it more difficult for older adults to regain their functional capacity. Regarding gait speed, a study on older adults exposed to normal baric hypoxia found that acute exposure did not affect gait patterns,36) contrary to our findings on the chronicity of exposure, type of hypoxia, and gait speed patterns in older adults.
Previous studies have reported that older adults living at high altitudes present with some balance disorders,9) indicating that the loss of balance is influenced by hypobaric hypoxia in populations living in high-altitude Andean areas,9) due to alterations in visual, proprioceptive, vestibular, and motor cortex functions.37,38) Hypobaric hypoxia not only affects the somatosensory region but also inhibits the activation of muscle mechanoreceptors.39,40) However, under conditions of moderate hypoxia, falls may be reduced, and balance disorders may not develop in older adults.34,41)
Reduced gait speed may contribute to the early identification of functional deficiencies in vulnerable older adults, potentially increasing survival in this population.42,43) To date, no studies have evaluated the association between decreased gait speed and impaired balance in older adults. However, decreased gait speed reflects altered musculoskeletal system function, which serves as an early predictor of disability, cognitive deterioration, and risk of falls in older adults.44,45) Balance disorders are associated with the risk of falling in older adults, caused by loss of balance.46) Treatments aiming to improve gait speed and muscle strength improve balance, prevent falls, and reduce morbidity and mortality among older adults.47,48) We observed an association between lower gait speed and the presence of balance disorders in the present study, a finding not previously described in geriatric populations in high-altitude Andean areas, but which correlates with hypotheses of previous studies.
Age-related anatomical and functional changes in neuromuscular function, perception, and cognitive systems impair gait control and balance.49) Impairments in gait and balance are particularly important in older adults because they contribute to the risk of injuries and falls and jeopardize their independence,50) thereby underscoring the importance of early evaluation. Although electronic walkways, force plates, and body sensors can be used to assess gait and balance,51) high-altitude Andean rural localities in Peru have no access to these instruments. Thus, more accessible instruments are used instead, including the SPPB for the evaluation of gait speed and the functional reach test for the evaluation of balance disorders.
The present study has some limitations. First, the study population included only Peruvians from 12 high-altitude Andean communities; thus, extrapolation to the remaining Peruvian population may be limited. Second, the cross-sectional study design did not allow the assessment of causality between balance disorders and gait speed. Third, some variables included in the study were collected through self-reporting; therefore, information bias may have affected the results. Fourth, some variables such as alcohol consumption could not be measured because of the low educational level of the population. However, the main variables of the study were performance-based measures, which are useful, easy to administer, and have good diagnostic performance.42) Fifth, some of the included variables had missing values; however, the percentage of these variables did not exceed 20%; thus, they could be included in the analysis.
In conclusion, our study results demonstrated that the intermediate and low tertiles of gait speed are associated with a higher prevalence of balance disorders in older adult residents of 12 high-altitude Andean communities in Peru. Given the lack of studies evaluating this association, research is necessary to further investigate this association in different high-altitude Andean communities, as well as in age groups with various comorbidities, to develop possible interventions in these vulnerable groups and reduce the impact of geriatric conditions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The researchers claim no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

None.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization, FOZ, KUC, DUP; Data curation, DUP; Methodology, DUP, FMRC; Supervision, DUP, FMRC, JFP; Writing-original draft, all authors; Writing-review & editing, all authors.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.24.0010.
Supplementary Table S1.
Descriptive analysis of the variables gait speed and balance disorders
agmr-24-0010-Supplementary-Table-S1.pdf
Supplementary Table S2.
Descriptive analysis of gait speed and functional reach according to sex and age
agmr-24-0010-Supplementary-Table-S2.pdf
Supplementary Table S3.
Crude and adjusted betas coefficients to estimate the association between gait speed tertiles and functional reach in older adults from 12 high Andean communities in Peru
agmr-24-0010-Supplementary-Table-S3.pdf

Table 1.
Descriptive and bivariate analysis of the variables of interest according to gait speed tertiles in older adults from 12 high Andean communities in Peru
Variable Total (n=418) Gait speed p-value
High tertile (n=138) Intermediate tertile (n=137) Lower tertile (n=143)
Sex 0.020*
 Female 256 (61.3) 83 (60.1) 96 (70.1) 77 (53.9)
 Male 162 (38.8) 55 (39.9) 41 (29.9) 66 (46.1)
Age (y) 73.2±6.9 73.9±6.6 74.0±6.8 71.8±7.1 0.715
 ≤70 165 (39.5) 48 (34.8) 50 (36.5) 67 (46.8) 0.202
 71–80 186 (44.5) 64 (46.4) 63 (46.0) 59 (41.3)
 >80 67 (16.0) 26 (18.8) 24 (17.5) 17 (11.9)
Marital status 0.085
 Single 43 (10.3) 14 (10.1) 14 (10.2) 15 (10.5)
 Married 251 (60.0) 76 (55.1) 77 (56.2) 98 (68.5)
 Widowed/divorced 124 (29.7) 48 (34.8) 46 (33.6) 30 (21.0)
Education level 0.432
 No education/incomplete primary 333 (79.7) 111 (80.4) 108 (78.8) 114 (79.7)
 Complete primary 75 (17.9) 26 (18.8) 23 (16.8) 26 (18.2)
 Completed secondary 10 (2.4) 1 (0.7) 6 (4.4) 3 (2.1)
Lives alone 0.098
 No 326 (78.0) 100 (72.5) 114 (83.2) 112 (78.3)
 Yes 92 (22.0) 38 (27.5) 23 (16.8) 31 (21.7)
Worked 0.043*
 No 197 (47.1) 77 (55.8) 60 (43.8) 60 (42.0)
 Yes 221 (52.9) 61 (44.2) 77 (56.2) 83 (58.0)
Altitude (MASL) 3,400 (3,315–3,445) 3,400 (2,158–3,511) 3,400 (3,275–3,445) 3,413 (3,364–3,445) 0.024*
Tobacco use 0.003*
 No 369 (88.3) 129 (93.5) 124 (90.5) 116 (81.1)
 Yes 49 (11.7) 9 (6.5) 13 (9.5) 27 (18.9)
Alcohol consumption <0.001*
 No 302 (72.3) 118 (85.5) 94 (68.6) 90 (62.9)
 Yes 116 (27.7) 20 (14.5) 43 (31.4) 53 (37.1)
Polypharmacy 0.005*
 No 405 (96.9) 138 (100) 133 (97.1) 134 (93.7)
 Yes 13 (3.1) 0 (0) 4 (2.9) 9 (6.3)
Comorbidities 0.001*
 0 187 (44.7) 80 (58.0) 57 (41.6) 50 (35.0)
 1 155 (37.1) 36 (26.1) 60 (43.8) 59 (41.2)
 2 or more 76 (18.2) 22 (15.9) 20 (14.6) 34 (23.8)
AHT 45 (10.8) 12 (8.7) 12 (8.8) 21 (14.7) 0.176
COPD 17 (4.1) 7 (5.1) 5 (3.7) 5 (3.5) 0.764
T2DM 3. 4 (8.1) 15 (10.9) 9 (6.6) 10 (7.0) 0.353
Low back pain 78 (18.7) 24 (17.4) 19 (13.9) 35 (24.5) 0.067
Urinary incontinence 142 (34.0) 28 (20.3) 59 (43.1) 55 (38.5) <0.001*
Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.6±3.7 25.0±3.0 26.1±3.6 25.7±4.4 <0.001*
Social support 0.559
 Always 174 (41.6) 56 (40.6) 62 (45.3) 56 (39.2)
 Sometimes/never 244 (58.4) 82 (59.4) 75 (54.7) 87 (60.8)
Neurocognitive disorder <0.001*
 No 258 (61.7) 65 (47.1) 87 (63.5) 106 (74.1)
 Mild 122 (29.2) 65 (47.1) 45 (32.9) 12 (8.4)
 Moderate 38 (9.1) 8 (5.8) 5 (3.6) 25 (17.5)
Depressive symptoms 0.001*
 No 198 (47.4) 48 (34.8) 75 (54.7) 75 (52.5)
 Yes 220 (52.6) 90 (65.2) 62 (45.3) 68 (47.5)
Disability 0.059
 No 202 (48.3) 56 (40.6) 75 (54.7) 71 (49.7)
 Yes 216 (51.7) 82 (59.4) 62 (45.3) 72 (50.3)
Falls in the last year 0.238
 No 159 (38.0) 49 (35.5) 60 (43.8) 50 (35.0)
 At least one 259 (62.0) 89 (64.5) 77 (56.2) 93 (65.0)
Balance disorders <0.001*
 No 214 (51.2) 99 (71.7) 67 (48.9) 48 (33.6)
 Yes 204 (48.8) 39 (28.3) 70 (51.1) 95 (66.4)

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range).

MASL, meters above sea level; AHT, arterial hypertension; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

* p<0.05.

Table 2.
Descriptive and bivariate analysis of the variables of interest according to the prevalence of balance disorders in older adults from 12 high Andean communities in Peru (n=418)
Variable Balance disorders p-value
No (n=214) Yes (n=204)
Gait speed <0.001*
 High tertile 99 (71.7) 39 (28.3)
 Intermediate tertile 67 (48.9) 70 (51.1)
 Lower tertile 48 (33.6) 95 (66.4)
Sex 0.309
 Female 126 (49.2) 130 (50.8)
 Male 88 (54.3) 74 (45.7)
Age (y) 73.0±6.6 73.4±7.2 0.483
 ≤70 87 (52.7) 78 (47.3) 0.866
 71–80 94 (50.5) 92 (49.5)
 >80 33 (49.3) 34 (50.7)
Marital status 0.008*
 Single 26 (60.5) 17 (39.5)
 Married 113 (45.0) 138 (55.0)
 Widowed/divorced 75 (60.5) 49 (39.5)
Education level 0.076
 No education/incomplete primary 169 (50.8) 164 (49.2)
 Complete primary 43 (57.3) 32 (42.7)
 Completed secondary 2 (20.0) 8 (80.0)
Lives alone 0.062
 No 159 (48.8) 167 (51.2)
 Yes 55 (59.8) 37 (40.2)
Worked 0.179
 No 94 (47.7) 103 (52.3)
 Yes 120 (54.3) 101 (45.7)
Altitude (MASL) 3,400 (3,275–3,414) 3,413 (3,336–3,511) 0.014*
Tobacco use 0.002*
 No 199 (53.9) 170 (46.1)
 Yes 15 (30.6) 34 (69.4)
Alcohol consumption <0.001*
 No 183 (60.6) 119 (39.4)
 Yes 31 (26.7) 85 (73.3)
Polypharmacy 0.001*
 Nope 213 (52.6) 192 (47.4)
 Yes 1 (7.7) 12 (92.3)
Comorbidities 0.081
 0 107 (57.2) 80 (42.8)
 1 73 (47.1) 82 (52.9)
 2 or more 34 (44.7) 42 (55.3)
AHT 17 (37.8) 28 (62.2) 0.057
COPD 8 (47.1) 9 (52.9) 0.728
T2DM 16 (47.1) 18 (52.9) 0.615
Low back pain 35 (44.9) 43 (55.1) 0.215
Urinary incontinence 73 (51.4) 69 (48.6) 0.950
Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.1±3.4 26.3±4.0 0.002*
Social support 0.018*
 Always 101 (58.1) 73 (41.9)
 Sometimes/never 113 (46.3) 131 (53.7)
Neurocognitive disorder <0.001*
 No 125 (48.5) 133 (51.5)
 Mild 81 (66.4) 41 (33.6)
 Moderate 8 (21.0) 30 (79.0)
Depressive symptoms 0.194
 No 108 (54.6) 90 (45.4)
 Yes 106 (48.2) 114 (51.8)
Disability 0.001*
 No 121 (59.9) 81 (40.1)
 Yes 93 (43.1) 123 (56.9)
Falls in the last year <0.001*
 No 110 (69.2) 49 (30.8)
 At least one 104 (40.2) 155 (59.8)

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range).

MASL, meters above sea level; AHT, arterial hypertension; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

* p<0.05.

Table 3.
Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios to estimate the association between gait speed tertiles and balance disorders in older adults from 12 high Andean communities in Peru
Gait speed Crude Adjusted
cPR (95% CI) p-value aPRa) (95% CI) p-value
High tertile Reference - Reference -
Intermediate tertile 1.81 (1.32–2.47) <0.001* 1.88 (1.39–2.55) <0.001*
Low tertile 2.35 (1.78–3.14) <0.001* 2.04 (1.51–2.76) <0.001*

cPR, crude prevalence ratio; aPR, adjusted prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a) Adjusted for sex, age, educational level, living alone, work, comorbidities, neurocognitive disorder, depressive symptomatology, and disability.

* p<0.05.

REFERENCES

1. Tian Q, Zhang M, Deng Y, Duan J, Tu Q, Cao Y, et al. Does gait speed replace comprehensive geriatric assessment in the elderly? Int J Gerontol 2016;10:232–6.
crossref
2. Cheng SJ, Yang YR, Cheng FY, Chen IH, Wang RY. The changes of muscle strength and functional activities during aging in male and female populations. Int J Gerontol 2014;8:197–202.
crossref
3. Middleton A, Fritz SL, Lusardi M. Walking speed: the functional vital sign. J Aging Phys Act 2015;23:314–22.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Larson ST, Wilbur J. Muscle weakness in adults: evaluation and differential diagnosis. Am Fam Physician 2020;101:95–108.
pmid
5. Kumfu S, Poncumhak P. Predictive ability of the three-time stand and walk test to determine frailty and its associations with fear of falling and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2022;26:316–22.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Louis ED, Mayer SA, Rowland LP. Meritt’s neurology. 13th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2016. p. 296–396.

7. Eibling D. Balance disorders in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 2018;34:175–81.
crossref pmid
8. Osoba MY, Rao AK, Agrawal SK, Lalwani AK. Balance and gait in the elderly: a contemporary review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2019;4:143–53.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Debenham MI, Smuin JN, Grantham TD, Ainslie PN, Dalton BH. Hypoxia and standing balance. Eur J Appl Physiol 2021;121:993–1008.
crossref pmid pdf
10. Holness DE, Fraser WD, Eastman DE, Porlier JA, Paul MA. Postural stability during slow-onset and rapid-onset hypoxia. Aviat Space Environ Med 1982;53:647–51.
pmid
11. Stevens KN, Lang IA, Guralnik JM, Melzer D. Epidemiology of balance and dizziness in a national population: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing 2008;37:300–5.
crossref pmid
12. Desplanches D, Hoppeler H, Tuscher L, Mayet MH, Spielvogel H, Ferretti G, et al. Muscle tissue adaptations of high-altitude natives to training in chronic hypoxia or acute normoxia. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1996;81:1946–51.
crossref pmid
13. Jung WS, Kim SW, Kim JW, Park HY. Resistance training in hypoxia as a new therapeutic modality for sarcopenia: a narrative review. Life (Basel) 2021;11:106.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Murphy MA, Olson SL, Protas EJ, Overby AR. Screening for falls in community-dwelling elderly. J Aging Phys Act 2003;11:66–80.
crossref
15. Weiner DK, Duncan PW, Chandler J, Studenski SA. Functional reach: a marker of physical frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:203–7.
crossref pmid
16. Estela-Ayamamani D, Espinoza-Figueroa J, Columbus-Morales M, Runzer-Colmenares F, Parodi JF, Mayta-Tristan P. Physical performance of older adults living in rural areas at sea level and at high altitude in Peru. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2015;50:56–61.
crossref pmid
17. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, et al. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994;49:M85–94.
crossref pmid
18. De Dios del Valle R, Hernandez Sanchez AM, Rexach Cano LI, Cruz Jentoft AJ. Validation of a five-item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale in Spanish population. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2001;36:276–80.

19. Fernandez-San Martin M, Andrade-Rosa C, Molina JD, Munoz PE, Carretero B, Rodriguez M, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the geriatric depression scale (GDS) in primary care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;17:279–87.
crossref pmid
20. Branez-Condorena A, Soriano-Moreno DR, Navarro-Flores A, Solis-Chimoy B, Diaz-Barrera ME, Taype-Rondan A. Accuracy of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-4 and GDS-5 for the screening of depression among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021;16:e0253899.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1975;23:433–41.
crossref pmid
22. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:61–3.
crossref pmid
23. Rolfson DB, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, Tahir A, Rockwood K. Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale. Age Ageing 2006;35:526–9.
crossref pmid pmc
24. Noh JH, Jung HW, Ga H, Lim JY. Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2022;26:1–3.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
25. Verghese J, LeValley A, Hall CB, Katz MJ, Ambrose AF, Lipton RB. Epidemiology of gait disorders in community-residing older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:255–61.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Binotto MA, Lenardt MH, Rodriguez-Martinez MD. Physical frailty and gait speed in community elderly: a systematic review. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2018;52:e03392.
crossref pmid
27. Rodriguez G, Burga-Cisneros D, Cipriano G, Ortiz PJ, Tello T, Casas P, et al. Factors associated with slow walking speed in older adults of a district in Lima, Peru. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2017;34:619–26.
crossref pmid pdf
28. Diaz Villegas GM, Runzer Colmenares F. Calf circumference and its association with gait speed in elderly participants at Peruvian Naval Medical Center. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 2015;50:22–5.
crossref pmid
29. Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N. Balance disorders in the elderly: epidemiology and functional impact. Laryngoscope 2012;122:1858–61.
crossref pmid
30. Palmer KT, D’Angelo S, Harris EC, Linaker C, Coggon D. Sensory impairments, problems of balance and accidental injury at work: a case-control study. Occup Environ Med 2015;72:195–9.
crossref pmid pmc
31. Dyer AH, Lawlor B, Kennelly SP; NILVAD Study Group. Gait speed, cognition and falls in people living with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease: data from NILVAD. BMC Geriatr 2020;20:117.
crossref pmid pmc
32. Blain H, Carriere I, Sourial N, Berard C, Favier F, Colvez A, et al. Balance and walking speed predict subsequent 8-year mortality independently of current and intermediate events in well-functioning women aged 75 years and older. J Nutr Health Aging 2010;14:595–600.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Loprinzi PD, Crush E. Sensory impairment, functional balance and physical activity with all-cause mortality. J Phys Act Health 2016;13:980–7.
crossref pmid
34. Timon R, Camacho-Cardenosa M, Gonzalez-Custodio A, Olcina G, Gusi N, Camacho-Cardenosa A. Effect of hypoxic conditioning on functional fitness, balance and fear of falling in healthy older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2021;18:25.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
35. Naeije R, Huez S, Lamotte M, Retailleau K, Neupane S, Abramowicz D, et al. Pulmonary artery pressure limits exercise capacity at high altitude. Eur Respir J 2010;36:1049–55.
crossref pmid
36. Drum SN, Faude O, de Fay du Lavallaz E, Allemann R, Neve G, Donath L. Acute effects of walking at moderate normobaric hypoxia on gait and balance performance in healthy community-dwelling seniors: a randomized controlled crossover study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2016;67:74–9.
crossref pmid
37. Clarke SB, Deighton K, Newman C, Nicholson G, Gallagher L, Boos CJ, et al. Changes in balance and joint position sense during a 12-day high altitude trek: the British Services Dhaulagiri medical research expedition. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190919.
crossref pmid pmc
38. Stadelmann K, Latshang TD, Lo Cascio CM, Clark RA, Huber R, Kohler M, et al. Impaired postural control in healthy men at moderate altitude (1630 m and 2590 m): data from a randomized trial. PLoS One 2015;10:e0116695.
crossref pmid pmc
39. Degache F, Serain E, Roy S, Faiss R, Millet GP. The fatigue-induced alteration in postural control is larger in hypobaric than in normobaric hypoxia. Sci Rep 2020;10:483.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
40. Degache F, Van Zaen J, Oehen L, Guex K, Trabucchi P, Millet G. Alterations in postural control during the world’s most challenging mountain ultra-marathon. PLoS One 2014;9:e84554.
crossref pmid pmc
41. Schega L, Peter B, Brigadski T, Lebmann V, Isermann B, Hamacher D, et al. Effect of intermittent normobaric hypoxia on aerobic capacity and cognitive function in older people. J Sci Med Sport 2016;19:941–5.
crossref pmid
42. Omana H, Bezaire K, Brady K, Davies J, Louwagie N, Power S, et al. Functional reach test, single-leg stance test, and tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment for the prediction of falls in older adults: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2021;101:pzab173.
crossref pmid
43. Kyrdalen IL, Thingstad P, Sandvik L, Ormstad H. Associations between gait speed and well-known fall risk factors among community-dwelling older adults. Physiother Res Int 2019;24:e1743.
crossref pmid pdf
44. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Beauchet O, Bonnefoy M, et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:881–9.
crossref pmid pdf
45. Nakakubo S, Doi T, Makizako H, Tsutsumimoto K, Hotta R, Kurita S, et al. Association of walk ratio during normal gait speed and fall in community-dwelling elderly people. Gait Posture 2018;66:151–4.
crossref pmid
46. Rico CL, Curcio CL. Fear of falling and environmental factors: a scoping review. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2022;26:83–93.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
47. Garcia-Flores FI, Rivera-Cisneros AE, Sanchez-Gonzalez JM, Guardado-Mendoza R, Torres-Gutierrez JL. Correlation between gait speed and muscular strength with balance for reducing falls among elderly. Cir Cir 2016;84:392–7.
crossref pmid
48. Naczk M, Marszalek S, Naczk A. Inertial training improves strength, balance, and gait speed in elderly nursing home residents. Clin Interv Aging 2020;15:177–84.
crossref pmid pmc
49. Chen B, Shin S. Bibliometric analysis on research trend of accidental falls in older adults by using citespace-focused on Web of Science Core Collection (2010-2020). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:1663.
crossref pmid pmc
50. Viswanathan A, Sudarsky L. Balance and gait problems in the elderly. Handb Clin Neurol 2012;103:623–34.
crossref pmid
51. Bahureksa L, Najafi B, Saleh A, Sabbagh M, Coon D, Mohler MJ, et al. The impact of mild cognitive impairment on gait and balance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using instrumented assessment. Gerontology 2017;63:67–83.
crossref pmid pmc pdf


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article Category

Browse all articles >

TOPICS

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#401 Yuksam Hyundai Venturetel, 20, Teheran-ro 25-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06132, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2269-1039    Fax: +82-2-2269-1040    E-mail: agmr.editorial@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Geriatrics Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next