Importance of Health Policy and Systems Research for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems: A Call to Action to Accelerate Progress
Article information
In recent decades, the field of rehabilitation has undergone substantial development, growth, and acceptance. Rehabilitation addresses the impact of health conditions on a person’s daily life by optimizing their functioning and reducing their disability experience. Rehabilitation expands the focus of health beyond preventative and curative care to ensure that people with health conditions can remain as independent as possible and participate in education, work, and meaningful life roles.1) A research definition of rehabilitation has been recently published.2) Scientific and clinical research has generated a body of knowledge that strongly supports the use of many rehabilitation interventions with positive outcomes in various populations and health conditions.
We also have a better understanding of the growing global needs, demands, and recognition of rehabilitation around the world. For example, it has been estimated that 2.41 billion people in the world could benefit from rehabilitation services. This means that at least one in every three persons in the world needs rehabilitation at some point during the course of their disease or injury.3) This figure has most likely increased because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The need for rehabilitation increased by 63% between 1990 and 2017 because of the aging population, the increasing prevalence of noncommunicable health conditions, and the shifting epidemiological profile in most countries.3) Finally, according to the 2022 global report on health equity for persons with disabilities, approximately 1.3 billion people, or 16% of the world’s population, have moderate to severe levels of disability associated with underlying health conditions and impairments.4) Now more than ever before, it is crucial that rehabilitation is available and accessible to populations globally according to their needs. The important contribution of rehabilitation to functioning, including social and occupational participation, and the well-being of populations worldwide, can no longer be denied or delayed. Rehabilitation is critical for the attainment of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 3, “Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.”5)
Notwithstanding the foregoing arguments there continues to be a high unmet need for rehabilitation globally, with some low- and middle-income countries reporting unmet needs in up to 50% of people who could benefit from rehabilitation. Rehabilitation services are not accessible to many people worldwide.6) Many of those in need do not have access because of failure, at least partially, to effectively plan for rehabilitation services. Many nations and health systems have not implemented policy measures that recognize rehabilitation as an essential component of universal health coverage.7,8) Health policy, planning, and decision-making for rehabilitation often require more local evidence to adequately plan, finance, implement, and monitor quality rehabilitation services, including infrastructure and workforce, to make services accessible to those in need.9)
The field of health policy and systems research (HPSR) seeks to understand and improve how societies organize themselves in achieving collective health goals and how different actors interact in the policy and implementation processes to contribute to policy outcomes.10,11) By nature, it is interdisciplinary, a blend of medicine and health sciences, economics, sociology, anthropology, political science, law sciences, public health, and epidemiology that together draw a comprehensive picture of how health systems respond and adapt to health policies and how health policies can shape—and be shaped—by health systems and the broader determinants of health. The importance of HPSR for rehabilitation has been recently highlighted with robust data that need be considered and used by the health policy and systems community and leadership.12) HPSR for rehabilitation generates the evidence needed by policymakers to make appropriate decisions and to develop action plans to enhance the capacity of the health system to serve the population in need of rehabilitation services. For example, the evidence generated by HPSR helps (1) establish priorities for delivering rehabilitation services; (2) evaluate the outcomes of various rehabilitation interventions in relation to the levels of care in the health system; (3) identify specific benefits to society justifying those decisions; and (4) strengthen health systems to increase access, quality, and provision of health services for rehabilitation.13) Supported by the recent resolution on “Strengthening rehabilitation in health systems” endorsed by the World Health Assembly for the first time in the history of the World Health Organization,14) it is time to leverage HPSR to support societal health goals as they apply to rehabilitation.
In 2022, the World Health Organization Rehabilitation Program established the World Rehabilitation Alliance (WRA)15) to strengthen networks and partnerships that advocate for the integration of rehabilitation into health systems. The WRA is a World Health Organization-hosted global network of stakeholders whose mission and mandate are to support the implementation of the Rehabilitation 2030 Initiative16) through advocacy activities. The WRA focuses on promoting rehabilitation as an essential health service that is integral to Universal Health Coverage and to the realization of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 3. The work of the WRA is divided into five workstreams: workforce, primary care, emergencies, external relations, and research. This research workstream is dedicated to the generation and routine use of HPSR evidence for planning and integrating rehabilitation into healthcare systems. The specific objectives of this study are to advocate for (1) the demand for and utilization of HPSR evidence for rehabilitation; (2) the widespread generation of high-quality HPSR evidence for rehabilitation; and (3) the publication, dissemination, and implementation of HPSR evidence for rehabilitation.
In this context, the coauthors of this editorial, on behalf of their respective academic journals, express their full support for the WRA’s mission in general and for the specific objectives of the research workstream. In concrete terms, we commit that our journals, as much as possible, will implement one or more of the following actions: (1) invite researchers in the field of HPSR for rehabilitation to submit their manuscripts to our journals for peer review and publication; (2) create a special journal section, series, or designation dedicated to HPSR for rehabilitation; (3) appoint editorial board members with expertise in HPSR for rehabilitation; and (4) disseminate research articles among funding agencies and policymakers. These actions by our academic journals will help the WRA achieve its goal of strengthening rehabilitation services for all.
Notes
This editorial is being published almost simultaneously in all journals listed to reach as many readers as possible: Acta Fisiatrica; Advances in Rehabilitation Science and Practice; American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research; Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Australian Occupational Therapy Journal; Brain and Spine; Chiropractic and Manual Therapies; Die Rehabilitation; European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; European Rehabilitation Journal; Foundation University Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences; Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences; Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation; Journal of Pakistan Medical Association; Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics; Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine; Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research; Medicina Riabilitativa; Neuropsychological Rehabilitation; Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair; Portuguese Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; Rehabilitación; Revista Colombiana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación; Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación; Revue Santé Publique; South African Journal of Physiotherapy; The Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine; and Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
*This editorial was prepared on behalf of the Health Policy and Systems Research for Rehabilitation Group (Editors-in-Chief of collaborating journals listed in alphabetical order): Iben Axen, DC, PhD (Chiropractic and Manual Therapies), Muhammad Ehab Azim, DPT, MS-NMPT (Foundation University Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences), Linamara Battistella, MD, PhD (Acta Fisiatrica), Kristian Borg, MD, PhD (Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine), Ines Campos, MD, MSc (Portuguese Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine), Rodrigo Castro, MD (Revista Colombiana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación), Joaquim Chaler, MD, PhD (Rehabilitación), Leighton Chan, MD, MPH (Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation), Ignacio Devesa, MD (Revista Mexicana de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación), Deniz Evcik, MD (Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation), Giorgio Ferriero, MD, PhD (European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine), Gerard E. Francisco, MD (The Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine), Simon French, PhD (Chiropractic and Manual Therapies), Steven A. Gard, PhD (Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics), Douglas P. Gross, PhD, BScPT (Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation), Matthieu Guemann, PT, PhD (European Rehabilitation Journal), Louise Gustafsson, PhD (Australian Occupational Therapy Journal), Allen Heinemann, PhD (Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation), Claire D. Johnson, DC, PhD (Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics), Frank Kandziora, MD, PhD (Brain and Spine), Carlotte Kiekens, MD (Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences), Jae-Young Lim, MD, PhD (Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research), Thorsten Meyer, PhD (Die Rehabilitation), Peggy Nelson, PhD (Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research), Randolph J. Nudo, PhD (Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair), Tamara Ownsworth, PhD (Executive Editor, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation), Wilco Peul, MD, PhD (Brain and Spine), Farooq Azam Rathore, MD, MSc (Section Editor, Journal of Pakistan Medical Association), Stefano Respizzi, MD (Medicina Riabilitativa), Christine Rolland, PhD (Revue Santé Publique), Carla Sabariego, PhD (Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences), Furqan Ahmed Siddiqi, DPT, PhD (Foundation University Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences), Manoj Sivan, MD (Advances in Rehabilitation Science and Practice), Birkan Sonel Tur, MD (Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation), Henk J. Stam, MD, PhD (Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine), Aimee Stewart, PhD (South African Journal of Physiotherapy).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The other authors claim no conflicts of interest.
FUNDING
None.