3. Alberts B. Impact factor distortions. Science 2013;340:787.
4. Simons K. The misused impact factor. Science 2008;322:165.
5. Research Excellence Framework. Decisions on assessing research impact. London, UK: Research Excellence Framework; 2011.
6. Penfield T, Baker MJ, Scoble R, Wykes MC. Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: a review. Res Eval 2014;23:21–32.
8. Visintin A. Differential models of hysteresis. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1994.
11. Fulmer T, Mate KS, Berman A. The age-friendly health system imperative. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018;66:22–4.
13. Lee YF, Hsu TW, Liang CS, Yeh TC, Chen TY, Chen NC, et al. The efficacy and safety of tube feeding in advanced dementia patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021;22:357–63.
15. Hsu CY, O’Connor M, Lee S. Understandings of death and dying for people of Chinese origin. Death Stud 2009;33:153–74.
16. Lee MC, Hinderer KA, Kehl KA. A systematic review of advance directives and advance care planning in Chinese people from Eastern and Western cultures. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2014;16:75–85.
17. Woo J. The myth of filial piety as a pillar for care of older adults among Chinese populations. Adv Geriatr Med Res 2020;2:e200012.
18. Lim WS, Wong CH, Ding YY, Rockwood K, Lien C. Translating the science of frailty in Singapore: results from the national frailty consensus discussion. Ann Acad Med Singap 2019;48:25–31.
19. Rennie D. Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review. JAMA 1986;256:2391–2.
20. Butler D. Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature 2013;495:433–5.
21. Evans AT, McNutt RA, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:422–8.
22. Stossel TP. Reviewer status and review quality: experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation. N Engl J Med 1985;312:658–9.
23. Bray R, Boon S. Towards a framework for research career development: an evaluation of the UK’s Vitae Researcher Development Framework. Int J Res Dev 2011;2:99–116.
24. Al Natsheh A, Gbadegeshin SA, Ghafel K, Mohammed O, Koskela A, Rimpilainen A, et al. The causes of valley of death: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED); 2021 Mar 8-9; Virtual event.
25. Cesari M, Calvani R, Canevelli M, Aprahamian I, de Souto Barreto P, Azzolino D, et al. On Schrodinger’s cat and evaluation of trials disrupted by the COVID19 pandemic: a critical appraisal. J Frailty Aging 2021;10:310–2.
26. Stokes DE. Pasteur's quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2011.